Laserfiche WebLink
December 15, 2014 Bowers Museum, SSA Project #14048 <br />YAW <br />SALLY SWANSON <br />'W"11*14- INC <br />ICC /ANSI A 117.1 -2003: <br />104.2 Dimensions. Dimensions that are not stated as "maximum" or "minimum" are absolute. All <br />dimensions are subject to conventional industry tolerances. <br />CCR. TITLE 24, PART 2: <br />11 B- 104.1.1 Construction and Manufacturing Tolerances. All dimensions are subject to conventional <br />building industry tolerances except where the requirement is stated as a range with specific minimum <br />and maximum end points. <br />In light of the immediately above definition provided in the California Building Code (CCR, Title 24, Part <br />2), the Division of the State Architect has issued an Interpretation of Regulations Document (DSA /AC) <br />IR 1 1 B -8 "Use of Predetermined Construction Tolerance Guidelines for Accessibility" (revised 1/1 /2011), <br />where a strong caveat is presented against use of pre- determined construction tolerances. In the IR, <br />the State Attorney General has stated: <br />"We are concerned that the local building officials and the members of the general public, when they consult <br />Construction Tolerance Guidelines,... may assume that they have been adopted by a state agency and therefore, <br />have the force of state law, which they do not. Such reliance, in our view, may result in violations of the California <br />Building Code and, possibly, litigation against the local building officials and /or property owners. <br />Added to IR 11 B -8 is the following quotation from a United States District Court: <br />"What is an acceptable `dimensional tolerance' will vary, depending in part to the purpose for the standard and <br />the technological capacity to closely adhere to the target dimensions. <br />Similar to dimensioning, the Building Official, the Division of the State Architect, the Department of <br />Justice (DO-1), or other Authority Having Jurisdiction are charged with the respective issues such as; <br />considerations and determinations relating to equivalent facilitation, readily achievable, <br />disproportionate cost, unreasonable hardship, structural impracticability, technically infeasible, and <br />the like. <br />The observations and findings contained herein are limited in scope. Approvals, permits, and <br />inspections may likely be required by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) for any correction required <br />to achieve compliance. This report does not intend to address the code compliant status of non - <br />accessibility items either implicitly or explicitly. Always check with the AHJ for local codes and <br />regulations that also may apply. Appropriate legal counsel should be retained concerning any <br />responsibilities, exposure to liability or other risks that the property owner could encounter. <br />December 15, 2014 55A Project #14048 Page 5 of 28 <br />