3 - PUBLIC HEARING ANNUAL ACTION PLAN

Home Browse Search

Page 4 of 5 form HUD-50075-HP (12/2014) B.4. Most Recent Fiscal Year Audit. (a) Were there any findings in the most recent FY Audit? Y N (b) If yes, please describe: There were two findings. The first finding stated, “During our review, we noted that the City did not have written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR section 200.305 Payment during fiscal year 2015.” The Cause was, “the City was unaware that this grant was subject to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, thus did not implement changes during fiscal year 2015”. The Effect was, “Failure to have a written pr ocedure to ensure the compliance with 2 CFR section 200.305 Payment may result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements.” The second finding stated, “During our review of compliance with the uniform guidance requirements, we noted that the City did not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs and the terms and conditions of the Federal award in fiscal year 2015. However, the City developed and implemented the written procedures during fiscal year 2016.” The Cause was, “the City was unaware tha t this grant was subject to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, thus did not implement changes during fiscal year 2015.” The Effective was, “Failure to have a written policy for determining allowability of costs and the terms and conditions of the Federal award may result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements.” Other Document and/or Certification Requirements. C.1 Certification Listing Policies and Programs that the PHA has Revised since Submission of its Last Annual Plan Form 50077-ST-HCV-HP, Certification of Compliance with PHA Plans and Related Regulations, must be submitted by the PHA as an electronic attachment to the PHA Plan. C.2 Civil Rights Certification. Form 50077-ST-HCV-HP, Certification of Compliance with PHA Plans and Related Regulations, must be submitted by the PHA as an electronic attachment to the PHA Plan. C.3 Resident Advisory Board (RAB) Comments. (a) Did the RAB(s) provide comments to the PHA Plan? Y N If yes, comments must be submitted by the PHA as an attachment to the PHA Plan. PHAs must also include a narrative describin g their analysis of the RAB recommendations and the decisions made on these recommendations. The City analyzed the recommendations of the Resident Advisory Board by: 1) considering the feasibility of each recommendation; 2) discussing as a team the opportunity for SAHA to implement each recommendation; and 3) making a determination on which recommendation(s) could be implemented or considered for future implementation. One of the primary recommendations we received was that SAHA needs to assist the most vulnerable populations in our community. A second primary recommendation was that the vacancy rate is very low in Santa Ana which prevents participants from finding and locating units. The RAB recommended we conduct more landlord outreach. All of the other recommendations are summarized in the comments and were taken into consideration by the agency. A decision was made on each recommendation and implemented in the draft HCV Administrative Plan. C.4 Certification by State or Local Officials. Form HUD 50077-SL, Certification by State or Local Officials of PHA Plans Consistency with the Consolidated Plan, must be submitted by the PHA as an electronic attachment to the PHA Plan. D Statement of Capital Improvements. Required in all years for all PHAs completing this form that administer public housing and receive funding from the Capital Fund Program (CFP). D.1 Capital Improvements. Include a reference here to the most recent HUD-approved 5-Year Action Plan (HUD-50075.2) and the date that it was approved by HUD. 3-6