My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25I - AGMT - DEVELOP GIS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
04/05/2016
>
25I - AGMT - DEVELOP GIS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2016 4:15:56 PM
Creation date
3/31/2016 3:14:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25I
Date
4/5/2016
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
g. References: Proposal shall include a listing of relevant projects with references for three <br />public entities for which Proposer has performed similar work within the past five (5) <br />years <br />2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE <br />Proposal shall include a Scope of Services and Schedule which details the work phases to be <br />completed, the tasks to be accomplished, the deliverables to be provided, and the schedule / <br />timeline to complete the project, based upon the requested Scope of Work, detailed in <br />Attachment 1, which is included in the Appendix of this RFP. <br />3. FEE PROPOSAL: <br />Proposer's fee proposal shall be submitted concurrently with the technical proposal, but in a <br />separately sealed envelope, clearly labeled as "Fee Proposal." This shall include the firm's <br />Standard Hourly Fee Schedule, and /or a Project Fee Schedule where applicable and as <br />outlined in the Scope of Work. <br />If required by the funding source, the fee proposal will not be opened until the proposals <br />have been evaluated by the proposal selection committee. The City will select the consultant <br />based on qualifications, and then negotiate a contract price based on available funding. <br />4. CERTIFICATIONS: <br />- Not Applicable <br />V. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION) <br />A. EVALUATION AND RATING <br />Refer to Section I, General. <br />B. SELECTION <br />The committee may interview the top ranking proposers. The City will recommend award of the <br />agreement to the proposer who will provide the best quality and value to the City. City reserves <br />the right to begin negotiations and enter into an agreement without interview or further <br />discussions. <br />VI. AWARD OF AGREEMENT <br />A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Following evaluation and rating by the proposal review committee, the Executive Director will <br />recommend award of an agreement to the proposer providing the best quality and value to the <br />City. <br />B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT <br />A standard agreement is included as Attachment 2, in the Appendix of this RFP. "Proposer" will <br />hereinafter be referred to as "Consultant" in standard agreement. The term of the agreement will <br />City of Santa Ana RFP 16 -013 <br />25T-14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.