My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31E - VARIANCE - 5105 W 1ST ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
04/19/2016
>
31E - VARIANCE - 5105 W 1ST ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2016 11:39:48 AM
Creation date
4/14/2016 7:02:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
31E
Date
4/19/2016
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Variance No. 2016 -02 <br />March 28, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />Proiect Description <br />The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing 3,400- square -foot building in order to construct a <br />two -story, 7,664 - square foot commercial center. The ground floor will consist of 4,695 square feet of <br />floor area that will be divided into two different uses: retail uses encompassing 3,200 square feet of <br />floor area and medical offices encompassing 1,495 square feet of floor area. The second level will <br />consist of approximately 2,969 square feet that will be devoted to professional and business office <br />uses. A total of 34 parking spaces are required for the office, retail and medical uses, with 34 spaces <br />to be provided for the project. The architectural design of the building is considered to be <br />contemporary, with a combination of smooth stucco finishes, metal roofs, metal louvers, decorative <br />reveals and upgraded light fixtures assisting in conveying a strong architectural design concept <br />(Exhibits 4 and 5). <br />Prolect Anaivsis <br />Variance requests are governed by Section 41 -638 of the SAMC. Variance requests may be granted <br />when it can be shown that there exists a special circumstance related to the property, such as size, <br />shape, topography, location or surroundings; that a variance is necessary for the preservation and <br />enjoyment of substantial property rights; that a variance will not be detrimental to the public or <br />surrounding property; or that a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan. if these findings <br />can be made, then it is appropriate to grant the variance. Conversely, the inability to make these <br />findings would result in a denial. Using this information, staff has prepared the following analysis, <br />which forms the basis for the recommendation contained in this report. <br />The applicant is proposing to obtain a variance from Section 41 -384 of the SAMC and reduce the <br />minimum lot size from 120 feet to 90 feet and allow the development of the proposed project. After <br />analyzing the proposal, staff is supportive of the applicant's request. The minimum street frontage <br />requirement is intended to ensure that a commercial development has adequate street frontage to <br />be a viable development with the potential for long -term success. It was found that many older <br />developments that had a narrower street frontage were less successful, had extensive tenant <br />turnover and a high vacancy rate due to minimal street visibility. This resulted in development sites <br />that were not maintained and generated an excessive amount of code enforcement contacts. To <br />address this concern, the commercial development standards were amended to require a minimum <br />street frontage. <br />The project site faces unique challenges created by its locational circumstances. The site shares <br />its western property line with an AT &T data center and its eastern property line with a 35 -unit <br />condominium complex. Both of those developments are well- established and have expressed no <br />intent to relocate, making the acquisition of additional land to meet the minimum street frontage <br />standard infeasible. Therefore, a unique circumstance exists related to the shape and location of <br />the parcel that necessitates the granting of a variance, thereby allowing the redevelopment of an <br />underutilized parcel of land that is located on a major arterial corridor. Further, the project will be in <br />compliance with all other development standards for a commercial project in the General <br />Commercial zoning district. <br />31 E -4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.