My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - PH - WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
06/07/2016
>
75E - PH - WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2016 4:41:33 PM
Creation date
6/2/2016 4:18:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75E
Date
6/7/2016
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2015 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN <br />consumption. Billed unmetered water is water that is delivered to a customer for a set fee but the actual <br />quantity of water is not metered. Customer accounts for this type of use are typically determined by utility <br />policy. Unbilled metered water is the volume used and recorded, but the customer is not charged. This <br />volume is typically used for City facilities per City policy. Unbilled unmetered water is authorized use that <br />is neither billed nor metered which typically includes activities such as firefighting, flushing of water mains <br />and sewers, street cleaning, and fire flow testing. The AWWA Water Audit recommends using the default <br />value of 1.25 percent to represent this use, as calculating an accurate volume is often tedious due to the <br />many different components involved and it represents a small portion of the City's overall use. For each <br />consumption type listed above the associated validation score reflects utility policy for customer accounts, <br />frequency of meter testing and replacement, computer -based billing and transition to electronic metering <br />systems. <br />Water Losses are defined as the difference between the volume of water supplied and the volume of <br />authorized consumption. Water losses are further broken down into apparent and real losses. Apparent <br />losses include unauthorized consumption, customer meter inaccuracies and systematic data handling <br />errors. Default percentages were provided for the Audit by AWWA for unauthorized consumption and <br />systematic data handling error as this data is not often available. The corresponding default validation <br />score assigned is 5 out of 10. A discrete validation score was included for customer meter inaccuracies to <br />represent quality of meter testing records, testing procedures for meter accuracy, meter replacement <br />cycles, and inclusion of new meter technology, <br />System Data includes information about the City's physical distribution system and customer accounts. <br />The information included is: length of mains, number of active and inactive service connections, location <br />of customer meters in relation to the property line, and the average operating pressure of the system. The <br />number of service connections is automatically divided by the length of mains to find the service <br />connection density of the system. The calculated service connection density determines which <br />performance indicators best represent a water system's real loss performance. The validity scores in this <br />section relate to the water system's policies and procedures for calculating and documenting the required <br />system data, quality of records kept, integration with an electronic database including GIS and SCADA, <br />and how often this data is verified. <br />The final section is Cost data and contains three important financial values related to system operation, <br />customer cost and water production. The total annual cost of operating the water system, customer retail <br />unit cost and the variable production cost per AF are included. The customer retail unit value is applied to <br />the apparent tosses to determine lost revenue, while the variable production cost is typically applied to <br />real losses. In water systems with scarce water supplies, a case can be made for real losses to be valued <br />at the retail rate, as this volume of water could be sold to additional customers if it were not lost.] Validity <br />scores for these items consider how often audits of the financial data and supporting documents are <br />compiled and if third -party accounting professionals are part of the process. <br />Calculations based on the entered and sufficiently valid data produce a series of results that help the City <br />quantify the volume and financial impacts of water loss and facilitate comparison of the City's water loss <br />performance with that of other water systems who have also performed water loss audits using the <br />AWWA methodology. The City's Data Validity Score was 74 out of 100, with a total water loss volume of <br />677 AFY. The Non - Revenue Water volume represents 1.9 percent of the total water supplied by the City. <br />The value of non - revenue water is calculated to be $814,980 per year. <br />75E -25 <br />arcadis.com 2 -5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.