My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
06/21/2016
>
75A - PH - MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2016 10:25:55 AM
Creation date
6/16/2016 5:23:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
6/21/2016
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance Amendment No. 2016 -01 <br />Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2016 -01 <br />May 23, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />:. . M <br />On March 16, 2009, the City adopted Ordinance Amendment No. 2008 -02 and Zoning Ordinance <br />Amendment No. 2008 -01 to amend Chapter 22 and Chapter 41 of the Municipal Code to regulate <br />massage establishments and massage technicians in response to concerns relating to the impacts of <br />massage establishments and the potential establishment of new locations in the city. Past <br />amendments to Chapter 41 included requirements for a CUP for massage establishments, a LUC for <br />ancillary massage uses, implemented separation criteria similar to adult entertainment uses, and <br />created operational standards specific to the massage use. The amendment to Chapter 22 included <br />requiring establishment operators to undergo a background check, obtain an annual establishment <br />permit, and required technicians to obtain a permit (Exhibits 1 and 2). <br />Subsequently, in September of 2009, California Senate Bill No. 731 (SB 731) became effective, which <br />restricted local governments' ability to regulate massage establishments and massage technicians. <br />The passage of SB 731 exempted massage technicians that possessed a massage technician <br />certificate issued by the California Massage Therapy Council ( CAMTC), a nonprofit public benefit <br />corporation, from regulations and permit requirements that were previously adopted by the City. The <br />new law required that massage establishments and other professional service uses be regulated in a <br />uniform manner, prohibiting local governments from requiring restrooms, showers, or other facilities <br />not required of other professional services. The changes to State law preempted City regulations and <br />made several provisions of the Code inconsistent with State law. Since that time, the City has been <br />unable to enforce the existing massage ordinance, and establishments and technicians have been <br />able to operate within the city without obtaining a CUP, LUC, or massage establishment permit. <br />On January 1, 2015, California Assembly Bill No. 1147 (AS 1147) became effective, amending <br />several sections of the Business and Professions Code and of the Government Code relating to <br />massage establishments. By adopting AS 1147, the State Legislature returned broad control over <br />land use in regulating massage establishments to local governments, provided only reasonable and <br />necessary fees and regulations were enacted. It also established a new CAMTC board of directors <br />so that it more fairly represents stakeholders; including adding representatives from the California <br />Police Chiefs Association, an anti - human trafficking organization, and a public health official. <br />Following the adoption of AB 1147, staff began holding interagency meetings and commenced a <br />study of the current provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code to determine what changes were <br />needed to the Code to make it consistent with State law, and to determine the best way to regulate <br />and permit massage establishments. <br />On April 25, 2016, staff presented the proposed amendments to Chapter 22 and Chapter 41 to the <br />Zoning and General Plan Subcommittee, comprised of Commissioners Bacerra, McLoughlin, and Mill. <br />The Zoning and General Plan Subcommittee did not reach a consensus. The major issues that were <br />75A -4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.