Laserfiche WebLink
L, <br />The parking rate applied in the Planet Fitness Study was from the LA Fitness Study (i.e., I spice per <br />182 sf or 5.5 spaces per 1,000 sf). As the most conservative rate of the alternatives to the City's <br />requirement, the LA Fitness rate is the most reasonable alternative to not underestimate the demand in <br />parking for a health chub in the City. <br />When applied to this 40,033 sf 24 Hour Fitness ,project, a parking rate of I space per 182 sf generates <br />221 parking spaces. The. entire square footage is used because the parking rates above were found by <br />analyzing the entire fitness club rather than only the workout area. Table F shows the results of applying <br />the alternate rate to the project site. Based on this, the highest demand for parking at the proposed 24 <br />Hour Fitness is 221 spaces. On weekdays, the peak number of parking spaces occupied in the center is <br />329 at 6:00 p.m. This leaves 280 residual parking spaces during peak weekday hours. Ohl weekends, the <br />Peak number of parking spices occupied in the center is 36 t spaces at 5 p.ni. This leaves 248 residual <br />parking spaces during the busiest time of the weekend. <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />According to the existing (February 2016) parking surveys, the center had a peak of 26 percent and 32 <br />percent of parking spaces being utilized on weekdays and weekends, respectively. With the addition or <br />the 241-four Fitness, the peak parking demand of the occupied uses was 361 spaces (i.e., 59 percent <br />utilization with 248 vacant spaces). The parking lot for the retail center is not expected to reach or <br />exceed capacity with the conversion of the vacant retail space to a 241 Hour Fitness health club. <br />Based on the shared parking analysis, the parki ng supply or 609 spaces can adequately accommodate <br />the existing and forecast peak parking demand of the entire center with the proposed project oil a <br />weekday and weekend. <br />Sincerely, <br />LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />I� <br />Ken Wilhelm <br />Principal <br />Attachments: Figure 1: Site Plan <br />Table B: Parking Summery <br />Table C: ILourly Member Sign -fn Counts <br />Table D: Variation in Parking Demand <br />Table F: Planet Fitness Study Parking Rates <br />NDS Parking Surveys <br />613116 ••PATHK 160hDo011arking Anu YY,,.J1m,.aacc•. <br />31 D -19 <br />