31D - CUP - 1400 W EDINGER AVE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Based on the daily average by hour, a minimum of 21 members (10:00 p.m.) and a maximum of 169 members (8:00 a.m.) arrived at these facilities. '['his represents significantly less .Attendance than would be realized using the City's parking rates for health clubs. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS Because the ('fly's parking requirements do not take into account the difference in demand during different hours of the day, a shared parking analysis has been performed to determine the appropriate nmrther of parking spaces for this project based on time -of -day factors. The Urban Land Institute (UL1) has collected data on the variation in parking demand for land uses (including health clubs) by time of day and has published that data in Shared Parking (Second Edition).' Table D displays the anticipated variation in parking demand generated by the proposed project using the City's Parking Requirement, which is then added to the observed existing parking demand to determine the future parking demand by time of day. This total is compared to the parking supply of 609 spaces to determine the number of shared spaces remaining. Table D includes separate utilization percentages for weekdays and weekends. As ,shown in Table D, the peak shared parking demand is 1,024 at 6:00 p.m. weekdays and 1,056 at 5 :00 p.m. weekends. Using the City's parking requirement of' I space per 28 sf, a mininuun of 317 spaces (10:00 p.m,) and a maximum of 904 spaces (6.00 p.m.) are utilized by the health club at one time. As stated earlier, this does not correspond to the sign -in data provided by 24 [lour Fitness. In 2015, Linscott Law & Greenspan. ?;nginccrs (1,1:,G) submitted a parking analysis for a proposed Planet Fihress at Pa cifiCenter.' Similar to this study, the Planet Fitness Study was conducted for the conversion of vacant retail space to it health club in a mixed -use center in Santa Ana. In the Planet Fitness Study, parking rates were identified from previous studies within the City, It was concluded that "larger (_greater than 30,000 sf), more 'amenitized' health clubs have much lower parking ratios compared to typical city code ratios." Table 1;, below, outlines the rates discussed in the Planet Fatness Study. Table E: Peale Parking hate Summary, Source Rate Santa Ana City Code 1 Space per 28 sf Pff? Parking Generation' I Space per 190 sl' -- LA Fitness Studies' I S gal ce pci I L2 2A 2009 24 Flory fitness 91udy (plus 17%COntinRcncy) _ I Space )er200&1' Spectrum Club Study ' 1 Space per 222 sl' 2009 24 []our Fitness Study-' (ror UPC Gym) I I S pace per 234 sf Institute td'I'rnnvpml;uinn Fnglnem n'rFi1 Parking G'enertidnu. Pouah riditlan (2010). ' Parking Study by Umentl Lae R Oreenspan, Engineers (i.M. Urban Land Indianan, Shared Pa Amt,,. Sccnnd P,ditiun, .taru ary 2005. Linscott Law & Greenspan. Engineers, Mwised Parking Deumnd Ann(,)rels.2015, 6l3llfi �P:ATIIICI fiU HDacVPurking Italy ±i. +..lunedocx - 31 D -18