My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65B - ARTS AND CULTURE MASTER PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
08/16/2016
>
65B - ARTS AND CULTURE MASTER PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2016 10:43:35 AM
Creation date
8/11/2016 6:03:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
65B
Date
8/16/2016
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana Arts Future <br />Community Arts and Cultural Master Plan <br />Several recommendations to develop a fund for arts infrastructure include: <br />Voluntary millage fee promoted via utility bills <br />« Dedicating a percentage of business taxes and fees <br />Dedicating Hotel/Motel tax dollars <br />Applying for grants such as: <br />o ArtPlace America Grant (up to $500,000) <br />o National Endowment for the Arts Our Town Grant (up to $250,000) <br />o California Arts Council Creative California Communities Grant (up to $70,000) <br />If the City decides to proceed with a live -work venue, a combination of a bond issue, tax <br />increment and private fund-raising could augment the resources that the nonprofit <br />developer would be raising. <br />Comparative cities Identified for their similarity of size or high Hispanic population and as examples of aspirational arts cities. <br />Over the longer term, the City should seek to institute a dedicated revenue stream to fund its arts and <br />cultural development programs. Examples include: <br />Many cities, including many in California, allocate a portion of the Transit Occupancy <br />(Hotel) Tax for the arts. <br />More than 600 municipalities allocate between 1 % and 2% of CIP project budgets for <br />public art. <br />Some cities extend the percent for art requirement to new private commercial, industrial <br />and residential development. <br />Some cities broaden the definition of public art in their percent for art policy to include <br />arts programming in public spaces. <br />Some cities (Denver, St. Louis, Salt Lake City, Pittsburgh) have created arts and cultural <br />funding districts that dedicate sales or property tax to fund the arts. It should be noted <br />that such dedication of taxes to specific purposes requires a 2/3rds vote of the citizens <br />under California's Proposition 13. <br />Sometimes Business Improvement Districts (BIDS) collect funds to support funding for <br />the arts. <br />« There are many cities that have created Friends of the Arts organizations or foundations <br />26 <br />65B-30 <br />FY2016 Budget Data for City Arts Funding in <br />Comparative Cites <br />City <br />Population <br />Hispanic <br />City Funding for theArt <br />PerCapita <br />Source i <br />CityTOT <br />Notes onUse <br />Riverside <br />314,000 <br />52 <br />$ 3,754,372 $ <br />11.96 <br />General Fund <br />13° <br />City Arts and City Owned Museum <br />Oxnard <br />204,000 <br />76° <br />$ 1,657,249 $ <br />8.12 <br />General Fund <br />10 <br />City Arts <br />Pordand <br />632,309 <br />P <br />$ 4,279,440 $ <br />6.77 <br />General Fund and % for Art 6°/ <br />Funds Regional Arts and Culture Council <br />San Antonio <br />1,380,000 <br />63 <br />$ 9,300,000$ <br />6.74 <br />TOT <br />H <br />City Arts and City Owned Museum <br />El Paso <br />835,593 <br />81 <br />$ 4,438,156 $ <br />5.31 <br />TOT <br />9°/ <br />City Arisand City Owned Museum <br />Santa Ana <br />331,00079°/ <br />$ 1,649,84 $ <br />4.98 <br />General Fund <br />11°/$175K <br />City Arts; $1.47MBowers <br />San Jose <br />1,003,000 <br />38° <br />$ 2,442;322 $ <br />2.44 <br />General Fund <br />10° <br />CIryN s <br />Comparative cities Identified for their similarity of size or high Hispanic population and as examples of aspirational arts cities. <br />Over the longer term, the City should seek to institute a dedicated revenue stream to fund its arts and <br />cultural development programs. Examples include: <br />Many cities, including many in California, allocate a portion of the Transit Occupancy <br />(Hotel) Tax for the arts. <br />More than 600 municipalities allocate between 1 % and 2% of CIP project budgets for <br />public art. <br />Some cities extend the percent for art requirement to new private commercial, industrial <br />and residential development. <br />Some cities broaden the definition of public art in their percent for art policy to include <br />arts programming in public spaces. <br />Some cities (Denver, St. Louis, Salt Lake City, Pittsburgh) have created arts and cultural <br />funding districts that dedicate sales or property tax to fund the arts. It should be noted <br />that such dedication of taxes to specific purposes requires a 2/3rds vote of the citizens <br />under California's Proposition 13. <br />Sometimes Business Improvement Districts (BIDS) collect funds to support funding for <br />the arts. <br />« There are many cities that have created Friends of the Arts organizations or foundations <br />26 <br />65B-30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.