25F - AGMT - PARKING STUDY - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

existing and identified redevelopment sites created in Task 3A. The demand component of the model will encompass demand rates reflecting traditional Santa Ana development (using ITE parking demand rates for single -use land uses potentially calibrated based on actual parking occupancy data) and MEMU mixed-use development (based on our modified version of the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking methodology that includes reductions for alternative mode use). DKS will run up to three modeling scenarios representing three timeframes and three levels of maturity of the development and surrounding context (including pedestrian, bicycle, transit and roadway infrastructure and services), and prepare maps illustrating the outcome. The modeling will help Identify and justify proposed transitionary and phased parking strategies by identifying the magnitude and location of any parking surplus or deficit, and allow the testing of various public and private parking strategies (e.g., the effect of locating a small public parking lot within the Active Task4: Transitional Parking Strategy Development and Proposed Zoning Code Purpose: This task uses the information from Tasks 2 and 3 to Inform the development of potential transitionary and phased strategies for implementing the parking requirements in the MEMU Overlay District. The menu of strategies will be vetted with City staff, stakeholders and decision -makers and refined into language appropriate for amending the City's zoning code and/or MEMU Overlay District's development standards. DKS, with technical support from RRM, will develop a menu of short-range and long-range transitionary parking strategies categorized by implementing entity, cost, effectiveness, timeframe and sub -district. RRM will prepare up to three development standard graphics to illustrate proposed strategies to the extent the strategies can be illustrated. DKS will provide technical supporting information from our literature review and research, data collection, and parking scenario modeling (from Task 36). Consideration would be given to the citywide applicability of the strategies. The menu of strategies will be initially vetted through City staff with the intent of presenting the strategies in a community/stakeholder forum and subsequently in a Planning Commission or City Council study session. The forum and study session would inform the preparation of potential language for amending the City's zoning code and MEMU Overlay District development standards. Task 5: Meeting Attendance, Deliverables, and Environmental Document Advisement Purpose: This task Identifies the meetings DKS staff will attend as part of this proposal and the level of effort DKS will commit to advising City staff with regards to the preparation of the environmental document for the comprehensive General Plan and zoning code update. Attendance at Meetings: DKS' Project Manager and/or Local Coordinatorwill prepare for, and attend, the following meetings: • Kick-off meeting with City staff One community workshops/stakeholder forum Monthly progress meetings with staff In person and/or by phone One Planning Commission or City Council study session or, alternatively, one Planning Commission General Plan & Zoning Subcommittee meeting One Planning Commission public hearing One City Council public hearing Deliverables: Administrative draft technical report (three hard copies) • Final public draft technical report (three hard copies) • Final public technical report (three hard copies) • Electronic files of all administrative draft, final public draft, and final public technical reports (one CD or USB flash drive) in both Microsoft Word format and editable PDF 13 25F-17