My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-12-20 Regular
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
2016-12-20 Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2019 1:45:57 PM
Creation date
1/24/2017 9:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
12/20/2016
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Carvalho, indicated that her preference is not to provide legal advice in public, <br />unless so requested by the City Council; highlighted process in the Charter that applies to all <br />appointed officials; vote for termination requires five votes and to place on Administrative <br />Leave requires four votes; separate rules and due process rights for City Manager exist in his <br />contract that requires noticing; also, noted that Administrative Leave is not termination; <br />reasonable cause needed to place on Leave to allow for investigation of claim or allegation. <br />Councilmember Benavides, if investigation has already taken place is it reasonable to <br />reopen? <br />City Attorney Carvalho, will need to be evaluated allegations; need to review new allegations. <br />Councilmember Benavides, asked if City has exposure and appearance of retaliation. <br />City Attorney Carvalho, it depends on the facts; caution against double jeopardy; any new <br />allegation would have to be reviewed. <br />Councilmember Sarmiento, procedurally can an evaluation be conducted by new <br />councilmembers? <br />City Attorney Carvalho, two part answer - current law allows members to place items on the <br />Agenda including closed session and case law permits standards of review on performance or <br />to set standards for future performance to be evaluated. <br />Councilmember Sarmiento, opined that comments by members of the public are fair <br />assessment; City may have exposure; have received communication in support of City <br />Manager from Chamber of Commerce in addition to Ryan Chase and First American Title; <br />need to manage issue carefully. <br />Councilmember Tinajero, narrated the dishonesty and shenanigans that this election has <br />brought about; highlighted the accomplishments that City Manager has accomplished in past <br />three years; previous labor negotiations resulted in same increase amongst all bargaining <br />groups; police officers are now held accountable; campaign contribution reports indicate that <br />police union active in election; also, asked if Mayor should be investigated for non-payment of <br />campaign loans. <br />City Attorney Carvalho, have taken matters forward to FPPC as requested by council; also <br />City Manager has investigative authority. <br />Councilmember Tinajero, asked if appropriate for new supervisor to evaluate employee. <br />City Attorney Carvalho, indicated that public comments appropriate and City Council comment <br />after the fact, mindful of Brown Act. <br />Councilmember Sarmiento, noted that closed session discussions are not disclosable and <br />now would be the time to comment. <br />City Attorney Carvalho, items may be discussed, just not the confidential items. <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2 DECEMBER 20, 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.