My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
21A - CDBG AND ESG ANNUAL PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
04/18/2017
>
21A - CDBG AND ESG ANNUAL PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2017 11:06:41 AM
Creation date
4/13/2017 5:46:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
21A
Date
4/18/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the HIM IS data entry system. Again in FY 17/18, funding will be provided for HIM IS data, <br />Coordinated Entry and technical assistance. 2 -1 -1 Orange County also administers the Vulnerability <br />Index - Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (VI- SPDAT) to prioritize chronically homeless <br />individuals for affordable housing opportunities. <br />3. Identify the process for making sub - awards and describe how the ESG allocation available to <br />private nonprofit organizations (including community and faith -based organizations). <br />For FY17/18 ESG funding, the Orange County ESG Collaborative (County of Orange, City of Anaheim, <br />City of Garden Grove, and the City of Santa Ana) released one Request for Proposals as a unified <br />approach to request, review and fundi ESG subrecipients. This collaborative approach has <br />streamlined the application and review process and allowed the grantees to better understand the <br />impacts of funding decisions. Future Collaborative efforts will include unified invoice and monitoring <br />forms and other actions to better serve homeless and at -risk of homeless families. <br />Following the Collaborative review, the recommendations for funding is considered by the <br />Community Redevelopment and Housing Commission before being considered and adopted by the <br />City Council. Allocations are made with consideration of ensuring that program funds would be <br />allocated toward eligible activities in the categories of homelessness prevention, rapid- rehousing, <br />shelter, data and street outreach, <br />4. If the jurisdiction is unable to meet the homeless participation requirement in 24 CFR <br />576.405(a), the jurisdiction must specify its plan for reaching out to and consulting with <br />homeless or formerly homeless individuals in considering policies and funding decisions <br />regarding facilities and services funded under ESG. <br />The City works closely with the County homeless services staff as well as local homeless service <br />providers, homeless advocacy groups, the OC Homeless Task Force, ACC -OC Homeless Task Force as <br />well as neighboring cities and homeless advocates. A representative of a prior homeless individual <br />was on the ESG RFP funding review panel. <br />5. Describe performance standards for evaluating ESG. <br />The City utilizes the HUD monitoring ESG handbook to monitor each program's performance to <br />OMB Control No: 2506 -0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) <br />Annual Action Plan 45 <br />2017 <br />21A-49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.