25I - AGMT FOR REHABILIATION OF WELL NO. 32

Home Browse Search

acceptance parameters and other control system submittals associated with the planned improvements to ensure that all Contractor programming requirements are being executed in compliance with the specifications. It is important to note that while the majority of improvements will be designed for Well #32, much of the FAT and SAT criteria will pertain to John Garthe Pump Station. Well #32 cannot run without John Garthe Pump Station. 1. Provide a witnessed FAT Checklist for the Contractor's Programmer. 2. Provide a witnessed SAT Checklist for the Contractor's Programmer. 3, Provide a specification that documents how FAT and SAT testing will be conducted, how discrepancies will be noted, and how the Contractor is expected to note and correct all deficiencies. Tetra Tech will act as the City's agent during factory and on-site functional and performance acceptance testing and shall document and identify all functional and performance discrepancies and coordinate corrective actions to resolve identified discrepancies prior to City Acceptance, We have assumed 40 hours for FAT validation and 60 hours for SAT validation for Well #32 and John Garthe Pump Station. On an as -needed basis, Tetra Tech shall provide on-site support for commissioning (start-up) activities, in close coordination with the Well #32 Rehabilitation Improvements Contractor and PCS Integrator. We shall be present during system commissioning to verify all aspects of the control system and associated process equipment are exercised and to ensure deficiencies are corrected by the Contractor/PCS Integrator as they are found. Commissioning will not be considered complete until it has determined that all of the system requirements have been met. We have assumed 60 hours for commissioning support. Well #32 Rehabilitation Engineering Services Key Deliverables (independent of the 30%, 60%, 100% and final design set submittals) under this task are as follows: Site Audit Technical Memo attdum_: The "Site Audit" work sessions shall follow with a summary of hardware assessment findings. This TM will provide recommendations associated with hardware upgrades and standardization. 2. Instrument Database: A list of all existing hardware and configuration details shall be submitted for review and comment by the City A separate list of any proposed hardware shall also be included (this list shall identify which piece of hardware that it will be superseding). The format and proposed fields shall be approved by the City prior to development/submittal of this database. 3. ILO„_atabase: A list of all system 1/0 and communications interfaces shall be submitted for review and comment by the City The format and proposed fields shall be approved by the City prior to development/submittal of this database. 4, �Sitg CeratiQi�g 7gchnical Memorandum fTMI: The "Site Operations” work sessions shall follow with a field summary for review and comment by the City. The memorandum will include an organized summary of existing operating procedures, The TM shall also Include recommendations for improvements to system practices and procedures, 5. Functional Snecifs-cation: A functional specification, as described in the scope above, shall be submitted for review and comment by the City, The format and content outline shall be approved by the City prior to final development/submittal. 6. E8Tla6J Protocols: Acceptance testing protocols and criteria for all control system and criteria for all control system submittals will be submitted to the City for review and comment. 251-27