Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Ial Group <br />City of Santa Ana —April 27, 2017 <br />Policy Framework Maps <br />Exhibit 1: Master Plan of Highways <br />Exhibit 2: Fixed Guideway Plan <br />Exhibit 3: Bicycle Master Plan <br />Exhibit 4: Pedestrian Opportunity Plan <br />Exhibit 5: Transit Policy <br />Exhibit 6: High Quality TransitlTransit Priority <br />Technical Appendix Maps <br />Exhibit A-2: CMP Roadway Network <br />Exhibit A-3: Truck Routes <br />Exhibit B-1: Proposed MPAH Changes <br />Exhibit B-7: High Frequency Transit Corridors <br />Exhibit B-8: Existing Bikeways <br />We have identified three options for completing revisions. Under option #1, we will amend 12 maps <br />in Adobe Illustrator with a single set of edits provided by the City. However, the maps will have <br />limited use. If the maps are produced in GIS, they would offer the City flexibility to mix and match, <br />as desired, with any other GIS -based layers produced for the general plan. If this flexibility is <br />desired, Option 2 is for the City to digitize the data and then transfer the data to PlaceWorks for <br />placing it on a base map and illustration. Options 3 is for PlaceWorks to digitize the data, create <br />the maps, and customize them in Illustrator. <br />9e. Revisions to the Circulation Element <br />We expect that the draft Circulation Element and Technical Appendix will require some revisions. <br />While the original Amendment #2 focused on revisions to the policy framework, we assume that <br />this task will be expanded to cover both the policy framework and the technical appendix. In <br />making our cost estimates, we assume that City staff will provide a single consolidated set of all <br />revisions requested. To ensure we understand the revisions, we would anticipate meeting with <br />you to review the revisions. This will allow us to hear and discuss the comments with you so as to <br />expedite completion of this task. <br />9f. Staff Meetings <br />This task involves three meetings. We anticipate that the project team would meet with you at the <br />outset to define expectations, exchange information, identify issues, and officially commence the <br />work. The second meeting would be to discuss new City land use and regulatory developments <br />that affect the policy framework. This would include discussions on VMTlLOS and land use <br />framework. The third meeting would be held midway through the project to review revisions to the <br />Technical Appendix and policy framework for the Circulation Element. A fourth and final meeting <br />would be to discuss the public presentation. <br />9g. Public Hearings <br />The project will conclude with hearings before elected and appointed bodies. PlaceWorks will <br />prepare and present a powerpoint on the circulation element at three venues—the Transportation <br />Subcommittee, Planning Commission, and City Council. The powerpoint is intended to be user- <br />friendly, filled with photos, and suitable for nontechnical audiences. IBI will be present to answer <br />technical questions. We assume that the powerpoint presentation will be prepared once, with <br />generally the same material for each audience. PlaceWorks is available to make extra <br />presentations on a time and material basis. <br />