My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-046 - Approving Addendum Nos. 1 and 2
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2017
>
2017-046 - Approving Addendum Nos. 1 and 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2017 3:00:08 PM
Creation date
7/11/2017 9:25:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-046
Date
7/5/2017
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
809
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana/Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project Addendum <br />• Consideration of underground fiber optic lines from SARTC to the OCTA Garden Grove Bus Annex north of <br />the PE ROW, about 1500 feet west of Harbor Blvd. <br />Operational Improvements: Two changes to the Project's operations are proposed as part of the modifications: <br />• Increasing the maximum speed within the PE ROW from 35 miles per hour (mph) to 45 mph. The increased <br />speed reduces travel time, providing operational cost and ridership benefits, and, <br />• Implementation of traffic signal priority at all traffic signals along the route except for Main Street, Broadway, <br />and Bristol Street. <br />4. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF DESIGN MODIFICATIONS <br />To evaluate whether the proposed design modifications would result in a new significant impact, increase in the <br />seventy of an impact, or require new mitigation measures, OCTA undertook environmental review and where <br />needed, conducted a technical analysis of each Project feature update. The following technical reports were <br />prepared as part of this analysis and are included as attachments to this Addendum: <br />• Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) Supplement (HDR, 2016) (Appendix A) <br />• Cultural Resources Update Technical Memorandum (HDR, 2016) (Appendix B) <br />• Traffic Study Addendum v2 (IBI Group, 2016) (Appendix C) <br />• Supplemental Noise and Vibration Technical Analysis (HDR, 2016) (Appendix D) <br />The technical analysis was coordinated with the 30% design work that was progressing on the Project. In some <br />cases, specific design modifications were refined based upon analysis undertaken in the 30% design work. <br />The CEQA Guidelines require that a brief explanation be provided to support the findings that no subsequent EIR or <br />Negative Declaration is needed for further discretionary approval. A summary of findings from the re-evaluation of <br />each of the environmental issue areas that were analyzed in the Project EIR are described below. <br />Effects Determined Not Adverse <br />The Project EIR identified the following environmental resource areas that would not be impacted by the proposed <br />Project: coastal zones, wetlands and navigable waterways, ecologically sensitive areas, and endangered and/or <br />threatened plant and animal species. <br />The proposed design modifications would not significantly impact these resources as these resources are not present <br />within, or in proximity to, the limits of disturbance associated with implementation of the design modifications. No <br />additional impacts would occur to these environmental resources and the conclusions that the project would not <br />result in a significant impact to these resources as identified in the EIR remain accurate. <br />Land Use and Zoning <br />The potential land use and zoning impacts (including agricultural and forestry resources) associated with the <br />construction and operation of the Project were evaluated in the EIR. Since the certification of the EIR, there have <br />been no changes to the land use or zoning environment, and the fundamental characteristics of the Project as <br />evaluated in the EIR have not changed. The EIR concluded that impacts related to land use and zoning and <br />agricultural and forestry resources were determined to be less than significant. No mitigation measures were <br />required. <br />The proposed design modifications would not change the fundamental characteristics of the Project. The proposed <br />Project design modifications would not expand or increase the development footprint in such a manner as to create a <br />5 I age 1170726.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.