My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-046 - Approving Addendum Nos. 1 and 2
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2017
>
2017-046 - Approving Addendum Nos. 1 and 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2017 3:00:08 PM
Creation date
7/11/2017 9:25:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-046
Date
7/5/2017
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
809
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana/Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project Addendum <br />• Human annoyance to residential land use — 145 Feet <br />• Human annoyance to institutional land use — 115 Feet <br />Any structures within the distances identified above would be considered impacted due to use of construction <br />equipment such as a vibratory roller. The proposed modified alignment would reduce the minimum distance to a <br />residential structure to 37 feet. While this distance is within the annoyance area it is outside of the potential damage <br />area. <br />Traction Power Substation Noise Analysis <br />The noise sources on TPSS units are the transformer hum and noise from cooling systems. The wall mounted HVAC <br />units are the primary noise source on the proposed TPSS units. <br />TPSS units 1 and 4 are located in residential areas. Table N of the Supplemental Noise and Vibration Technical <br />Analysis (see Appendix D) shows the predicted noise level at the TPSS sites. This table also lists the FTA noise <br />impact criteria, in which a noise level above the specified dBA would be considered an impact. For TPSS unit 1, a <br />noise level exceeding 54 dBA would be considered an impact. For TPSS unit 4, a noise level exceeding 59 dBA <br />would be considered an impact. As shown in Table N, noise levels would be 42 dBA at TPSS unit 1 and 46 dBA at <br />TPSS unit 4. These noise levels are less than the specified thresholds of 54 dBA (unit 1) and 59 dBA (unit 4), <br />therefore, there would be no impact associated with the TPSS units. However, it is recommended that the following <br />measures be implemented to ensure that the impact is below a level of significance: <br />• Orient the TPSS unit so that the HVAC units, the primary source of noise, are pointing away from the <br />nearest residence. <br />At the residential locations, the TPSS units will be designed so as not to exceed a maximum noise level of <br />45 dBA at a distance of 50 feet from the unit or at the setback line of the nearest building, whichever is <br />closer. <br />The potential noise and vibration impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project were <br />evaluated in the EIR. Since the certification of the EIR, there have been some design modifications that have the <br />potential to change the noise and vibration characteristics of the proposed Project as evaluated in the EIR. These <br />design modifications have been evaluated as summarized above. Based on this supplemental evaluation, it has <br />been determined that the proposed design modifications would not result in a new impact, increase in the seventy of <br />an impact, or require the implementation of a new mitigation measure as evaluated in the EIR. No additional noise or <br />vibration impact would occur and the conclusions and mitigation measures identified in the EIR remain accurate and <br />applicable to the proposed Project. <br />Air Quality <br />The potential air quality and greenhouse gas emissions (global climate change) impacts associated with both the <br />construction and operation of the proposed Project were evaluated in the EIR. There have been no changes to the <br />air quality environment as evaluated in the EIR. The proposed miner design modifications would change some of <br />proposed improvements within the corridor, however, the general Project constructions characteristics as described <br />in EIR would not be altered in such a manner as to result in an increase in the daily construction emissions, and no <br />new mitigation measures would be required. <br />In terms of short-term, construction -related air quality impacts, as described in the EIR (and applicable to the Project <br />with the proposed design modifications), construction activities would be completed in a segment by segment basis <br />to minimize the disruption to local residents and businesses in the Study Area. As concluded in the EIR, there would <br />be no exceedances of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regional significance thresholds as a <br />result of daily construction emissions. This conclusion would still apply with implementation of the proposed Project <br />modifications as the construction parameters and characteristics would be the same, no new significant short-term air <br />131P age 1170726.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.