Laserfiche WebLink
+� OCTA I Santa Ana/Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project <br />J Visual Impact Analysis Re-evaluation Technical Memo <br />Supplemental visual impactanalyses of the potential change in Visual contextfrom the minor <br />design modifications at Westminster Avenue Bridge and the Santa Ana River Bridge was <br />performed and compared againstthe previously approved analysis. The visual impact of two <br />wire catenarywithin the PE ROWis considered to be not adverse/less than significant in the <br />contextof the prioranalysis and presence of overhead wires in adjacent areas, therefore no <br />supplemental visual analysis was performed for this change. <br />Westminster Avenue Bridge — Segment 1 (Visual Character Area A) <br />The visual character of Area Awithin Segment 1 is influenced byadjacent commercial and <br />residential developmentthatborders the PE ROWand contains existing roadways, streettrees, <br />and residential neighborhoods. As provided in the 2015 EA, the visual qualityof Area Ais <br />considered Moderate Low to Moderate. Under existing conditions, Westminster Avenue is <br />situated at -grade within the PE ROWand contains median landscaped with grass and several <br />tall. mature trees. <br />With the implementation of the LPA, Westminster Avenue would be maintained atgrade through <br />the PE ROWwith the streetcar alignment crossing via a new single span tied -arch bridge <br />crossing up to 220feet in length with a maximum deck height of 23 feet. Although no bridge <br />design was prepared for the Westminster Avenue Bridge as part of the 2015 EA, for Visual <br />analysis purposes, the 2015 EAdepicted the bridge in a conceptual photo simulation as a single <br />span arched bridge. Figure 2 illustrates the existing at -grade crossing and proposed conditions <br />under the approved 2015 LPA, with a single span tied -arch bridge. <br />As an outcome of advancing the projectdesign and performing value engineering for the LPA, <br />OCTA determined that more efficient bridge design options could be implemented at the <br />WestminsterAvenue location. This resulted in the selection of concrete box girder bridge <br />design thatis more co nve ntionally used in highwayand light-rail/streetcar corridors throughout <br />southern California. The modified bridge design would include a two span concrete box girder <br />bridge structure, as depicted in Figure 3, which would have similar dimensions for deck height <br />and total length as compared to the conceptual bridge structure depicted in the 2015 EA. The <br />main differences between the previously -depicted bridge and the currentbridge type include the <br />elimination of the arches and hangers in the bridge's superstructure, which would increase the <br />visibilityof the catenarywires, and the addition of single bent(pier support) near the center of <br />the bridge. <br />As shown in Figure 3, the modified bridge's appearance within the PE ROWwould be similar to <br />what was previously shown for the bridge in terms of scale. Additionally, based on the <br />surrounding Moderate Lowto Moderatevisualquality,the minor modifications would notoccur <br />within an area that is highlysensitive to Visual change. <br />Similar to the bridge concept depicted in the 2015 EA, the existing mature trees along <br />Westminster Avenue would screen/buffer views of the bridge from adjacent vehicular and <br />pedestrian traffic. Although the bridge would be Visible to residences south of Westminster <br />Avenue and motorists driving along Westminster Avenue, the visual qualityof the area is urban <br />in nature such thatthe bridge's addition would have no adverse affect/no significant impact. <br />31 Page <br />