Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. ADDENDUM 'ARU3TROND RANCH REVURn PROJRCT <br />9EPTEMDER 21IT - RANTA,AHA. CALIFORNIA. <br />from the church.could fie characterized as a aark contract: to adjacent develop ri6it.'Mitigatioa <br />Measure V15-2 from the Certified Ell required preparatioh.of a lighting plan to;niinimize light <br />spillover -onto adjacent parcels. With implementation of Mitigation Measure VIS4, the Certified <br />FIR concluded the lighting and glare impacts of the Approved project would be reduced to less <br />than significant: <br />The Revised Project would introduce nighttime lighting to the Project site, however; the lighting <br />for the residential uses would not be expected to be out of character with the lighting provided for <br />existing adjacent uses. Similarly, lighting for the Church campus, which would b,e seduced in size. <br />compared to the Church facility proposed as part of the Approved Project, would be similar to <br />lighting tha£alreaayexi'sts around'diesahctuary and would be consistent with the character of <br />surrounding.uses, including Segetstrour High School. Wgifle new sources of light would be, <br />introduced, the nighttime character of the area would not greatly change from the existing <br />condition. Nevcril eless; the Revised Project would be expected to comply with'Mitigatioli <br />Measure VlS-2, which requires preparation of a lighting plan that specifies thatexterior lighting <br />at the perimeter of the. site be directed downward onto the Project site; and that feat res (e.g., <br />hoods, or liaiapct walls) be included where.nppropriate to minimize light spillover Onto adjacent <br />parcels. Mitigation Measure VIS -2 would address night lighting impacts associated with the <br />Revised Project and impacts would beseduced to a less than sitiiificant leveI 'therefore, new or <br />more severe sign lieani,impacis beyond those identified in theC.criffled Elk would not occur: <br />Tlie Revised Project would comply with Mitigation Measure VIS -2 from the Certified EIR and no <br />additional mitigation measures are required, <br />Mitigation Measures: <br />Based on the analysis and information above, Mitigation Measures VIS -1 and VIS -2 included in the <br />Certified IRR for the Approved Project would be applicable to the Revised Project. <br />VIS -I "11ie design and character of project architecture of the church component shall be <br />compatible with vicinity development. Architectural plans shall be reviewed during <br />site plan review, <br />VIS72' Residential project design shall include a lighting plan to specify'that,exterier <br />lightingt the perimeter of the site shall bedirected downward onto the;project site <br />and where'appropriate,,incl include features .(e.g., hoods -or parapet walls) to minimize <br />fight spill-over onto adjacent parcels. <br />Findings Related to Aesthetics: <br />No New Significant Effects Requiring Major Certified Elft Revisions. Based on the foregoing <br />analysis and information, there is no evidence that Project modifications requires major change to the <br />Certified EIR. The Project changes will not result in new significant enviromnental impacts related to <br />Aesthetics, and Ihere in so substantial increase in the severity of impacts described in the Certified <br />f:1R: <br />P:%1101h01'Addcodum%A&kcndum.docx AW051t7a <br />75B-61 <br />2-12 <br />