My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25F - AGMT EXTENSION OF THE SOLID WASTE SERVICES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
10/17/2017
>
25F - AGMT EXTENSION OF THE SOLID WASTE SERVICES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 1:54:33 PM
Creation date
10/16/2017 12:47:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25F
Date
10/17/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEW SOLID WASTE SERVICES <br />RFP FRAMEWORK <br />1. Council approval of RFP Process <br />a. Ex -Parte Communication Requirement: no contact allowed between proposers and City <br />Staff/Elected Officials throughout the duration of the process <br />b. Criteria and Weighting of proposal components (should reflect the specific, unique priorities <br />of the City) <br />I. Qualifications and Experience <br />ii. Proposed Collection and Diversion Services <br />iii. Customer Service, Outreach and Education, and Operational and Material <br />Management Infrastructure <br />iv. Cost Proposal (separate scoring for reasonableness and competitiveness, with <br />ranking based on overall contract revenue) <br />v. Interview (further demonstration of performance capabilities and alignment with <br />City goals) <br />Recommended weighting: <br />20% Qualifications and Experience <br />25% Proposed Collection and Diversion Services <br />20% Customer Service, Outreach and Education, and Infrastructure <br />30% Cost Proposal (reasonableness and competitiveness as measured by revenue <br />requirements) <br />5% Interview <br />2. Evaluation Approach <br />a. Evaluation conducted by committee including designated City staff, Public Works <br />Directors/Managers from two other cities, and consultant <br />b. Evaluation includes interviews with the proposers <br />3. Evaluation Report and Recommendation Approach <br />a. Report includes evaluation summary, scoring of proposers and ranking of proposers <br />Exhibit 4 <br />25F-81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.