My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2017-11-7
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
11/07/2017
>
FULL PACKET_2017-11-7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2017 4:12:45 PM
Creation date
11/6/2017 8:36:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
11/7/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
718
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Identify the process for making sub -awards and describe how the ESG allocation available to <br />private nonprofit organizations (including community and faith -based organizations). <br />For FY17/18 ESG funding, the Orange County ESG Collaborative (County of Orange, City of Anaheim, <br />City of Garden Grove, and the City of Santa Ana) released one Request for Proposals as a unified <br />approach to request, review and fundi ESG subrecipients. This collaborative approach has <br />streamlined the application and review process and allowed the grantees to better understand the <br />impacts of funding decisions. Future Collaborative efforts will include unified invoice and monitoring <br />forms and other actions to better serve homeless and at -risk of homeless families. <br />Following the Collaborative review, the recommendations for funding is considered by the <br />Community Redevelopment and Housing Commission before being considered and adopted by the <br />City Council. Allocations are made with consideration of ensuring that program funds would be <br />allocated toward eligible activities in the categories of, homelessness prevention, rapid -rehousing, <br />shelter, data and street outreach. <br />4. If the jurisdiction is unable to meet the homeless participation requirement in 24 CFR <br />576.405(a), the jurisdiction must specify its.plan for reaching out to and consulting with <br />homeless or formerly homeless individuals in considering policies and funding decisions <br />regarding facilities and services,funded under ESG. ' <br />The City works closely with the County homeless services staff,as well as local homeless service <br />providers, homeless advocacy groups, the OC'Homeless Task�Force, ACC -OC Homeless Task Force as <br />well as neighboring cities -and homeless advocates: A representative'of a prior homeless individual <br />was on the ESG RFP funding review panel.` <br />5. Describe performance.standards'forevaluating"ESG. <br />The City utilifes the HUD monitoring ESG handbook to monitor each program's performance to <br />ensure that goals are on track and funds are used far eligible activities. On a quarterly basis, invoices <br />are reviewed to ensure program compliance. In addition, the quarterly financial invoices are <br />monitored by City Accounting staff:,On-site monitoring of non-profit organizations is done by staff <br />and consultants for both program and financial records on an as -needed basis, or at least every <br />three years. <br />The City works closely with the OC ESG Collaborative to standardize as much as possible. <br />OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) <br />Annual Action Plan <br />2017 <br />21A-61 <br />48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.