My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
32A - PARCEL MAP SUBDIVID SAINT ANDREWS PL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
11/21/2017
>
32A - PARCEL MAP SUBDIVID SAINT ANDREWS PL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2017 6:23:26 PM
Creation date
11/20/2017 7:23:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
32A
Date
11/21/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Tuesday and Saturday Credit,Union surveys were conducted within the same <br />parameters as the Elk surveys. <br />The actual parking supply and demand at the Credit Union's parking lot is shown in <br />Tables 2-A and 2-e. <br />Parking Availability and Utilization <br />The total parking supply for the new Elk Lodge per se Is 157 spaces with an additional <br />220 spaces available, under the terms of the reciprocal parking agreement, at the <br />adjacent Credit Union, <br />Utilization of the parking supply for the new Lodge and Credit Union, as shown.on <br />Exhibit 3, isdetermined ,'by deducting the current Elk Lodge and Credit Union parking <br />demand, shown on Exhibits 1 and 2 as Parking Spaces Occupied, from the combined <br />parking supply, shown on Exhibit 3 as Total Parking Spaces. <br />As Table 2 shows, there is a continuing surplus of vacant parking spaces in the Credit <br />Union lot, it is unlikely that there would be a cross-over demand by .Credit Union <br />customers for parking in the Elk's lot. Given this condition, the Elk's parking demand is <br />deducted from the Elk's parking supply until the reciprocal parking agreement becomes <br />effective at which time the total parking demand is deducted from the combined parking <br />supply (157 Elk + 220 Credit Union = 377 combined parking spaces). <br />While Table 3 denotes existing parking demand and supply, it does not reflect the <br />parking demands associated with an Increase in or transfer of Credit Union employees <br />or -increases in Elk' membership. These issues will be discussed'in the following section <br />of this report. <br />Adjusted Parking. Demand and Availability <br />Tables 4-A and A -B show the combined parking supply after adjustments for new'and <br />transferred Credit Union employees and increases in Elk membership are made. An <br />explanation of the adjustments follows: <br />Credit Union Employee Transfer — As noted, it is the intent of the Credit Union to <br />transfer 90 employees, and presumably their parking demand, to their new office <br />space in the Elk's facility. Although the Credit Union does not have a formal <br />trip/parking reduction program a voluntary effort would seem to be in place as a <br />review of the Credit Union's week day parking characteristics shows a maximum <br />demand of 181 parked vehicles. If each employee drove their own vehicle to work <br />the minimum number of parked vehicles without considering client parking would be <br />190. It can be reasonably assumed, given that the survey was taken at the top of the <br />hour and that the Credit Union had just opened for business, that the majority if not <br />all of the 144 vehicles parked at 9:00 AM were employees and that the resulting <br />parked vehicle employee ratio of 1:1.32 would carry over to their new offices. <br />32A-34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.