My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25R - AGMT CENTER STREET URBAN GREENING DESIGN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
12/05/2017
>
25R - AGMT CENTER STREET URBAN GREENING DESIGN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 5:32:45 PM
Creation date
11/30/2017 7:30:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25R
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agreement with MS + MEGT for Consulting Architectural Design Services <br />December 5, 2017 <br />Page 2 <br />In July 2017, eight proposals were received. The proposals were evaluated by personnel from <br />the Public Works Agency; the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency; and the <br />Planning & Building Agency. Each firm was rated according to its firm/team experience, <br />understanding of need, relevant project experience, schedule, references, and proposed cost <br />and pricing data. The following is the list of the firms and their respective evaluation scores: <br />Rank <br />Firm <br />Score <br />1 <br />MS + MEGT <br />94.2 <br />2 <br />Little Diversified Architectural Consulting <br />91.2 <br />3 <br />RHA Landscapes Architects, Planners, Inc. <br />84.7 <br />4 <br />RJM Design Group <br />84.3 <br />5 <br />Adams Streeter Civil Engineers <br />82.3 <br />6 <br />Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. <br />82.2 <br />7 <br />SALT Landscape Architects <br />81.5 <br />8 <br />BMLA Landscape Architecture <br />80.5 <br />Based on the ranking and proposed fee, staff recommends that the top firm, MS + MEGT, be <br />retained to design the Center Street Urban Greening project for a fee in an amount not to exceed <br />$75,555, based on the schedule of rates and fees attached to the contract (Exhibit 2). Staff <br />requests authorization of a 10 percent design services contingency of $7,555, which results in the <br />total agreement amount not to exceed $83,110. <br />STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT <br />Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 - Community Facilities & <br />Infrastructure, Objective #1 (Establish and Maintain a Community Investment Plan for All City <br />Assets), Strategy G (Develop and Implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in <br />Coordination with the Community Investment and Deferred Maintenance Plans). <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />There is no environmental impact associated with this action. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Funds have been budgeted and are available for expenditure in the State Resources Agency <br />Grant Fund (Account No. 16113262-66220). Any unspent, encumbered balance will be carried <br />forward into subsequent fiscal years as needed to fulfill the agreement. Funds will be spent <br />according to the spending plan below: <br />25R-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.