My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - AGMT - AA SOLID WASTE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
12/05/2017
>
65A - AGMT - AA SOLID WASTE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 6:31:50 PM
Creation date
11/30/2017 7:30:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
65A
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana, California <br />Section 3. Scope of Requested Collection Services <br />company's ability to implement the services in accordance with the schedule presented in Table 1-2 of <br />this RFP. This description should include, but not be limited to: <br />1. A timeline showing the duration and completion date of major milestone events such as <br />vehicle purchase and testing; container purchase, assembly and distribution; personnel <br />hiring and training; customer service and billing database development and <br />implementation; administration; public education; corporation yard acquisition and <br />development (if necessary), etc. <br />2. Assumptions regarding the participation of City staff, City representatives, the current <br />collection contractor, and the current and future facility operator. <br />3. Identification of common problems that can occur in service initiation and strategies for <br />preventing or managing such problems. <br />4. Discussion of how customers will select container size(s) and service frequency. <br />5. Contingency plans for all aspects of implementation. <br />Proposer may provide one or more alternative proposals in addition to the requested proposal. The City <br />is not obligated to evaluate or select alternative proposals. Alternative proposals will be considered by <br />the City if the City concludes that the alternative proposals warrant evaluation and analysis. Proposers <br />that provide an alternative proposal(s) shall also respond to the entire RFP as written. <br />DRAFT RFP for Franchised Collection Services <br />65A-39 <br />11/28/17 Page 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.