My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH BRISTOL ST MEMORY LN PROJECT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
12/05/2017
>
75A - PH BRISTOL ST MEMORY LN PROJECT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 5:34:02 PM
Creation date
11/30/2017 7:30:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75A
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ew ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements — Project No. 17-6883 <br />ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to <br />be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section <br />5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, <br />the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American <br />tribe. <br />The Project is not subject to AB 52 and did not undergo the AB 52 Consultation Process. Notwithstanding, the 1990 <br />FEIS/EIR, no historical or archaeological resources were identified in the Project vicinity pertaining to Native <br />American resources. Further, during public noticing periods, letters received from the Office of Historic <br />Preservation indicated that the Bristol Widening Project would not affect historic properties. No correspondence <br />from any tribes were received during the 1990 FEIS/EIR. No new impacts have been identified. Should any <br />unknown tribal cultural resources be uncovered during grading/site disturbance activities, the Project would be <br />required to comply with the 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measure T-1. Impacts in this regard would be less than <br />significant. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measure T-1. <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS <br />This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />Measures, Subsection S, Effect on Utilities, and Subsection V, Construction Impacts. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control <br />Board? <br />The proposed Project entails intersection improvements; such improvements would not result in the generation of <br />wastewater. No new significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed <br />in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable. <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treahnent facilities or expansion of <br />eristingfacilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? <br />The proposed Project would not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities <br />or expansion of existing facilities. No new significant impact is anticipated. Implementation of 1990 FEIS/EIR <br />Mitigation Measures V-14 and V-17 would reduce impacts to less than significant. Impacts would not be greater <br />than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: <br />V-14 Project plans and construction activities will be closely coordinated with local utility purveyors in <br />order to make the necessary arrangements for the relocation of facilities and avoid or minimize any <br />disruption to service. It is also recommended that the utilities provide adequate notice to its customers <br />of any service disruptions. <br />V-17 The City of Santa Ana's Public Works Director will coordinate closely with all agencies and <br />companies which maintain underground or at -grade utility or energy facilities within the areas to be <br />disturbed by project construction activities. Preliminary and final design plans will be made available <br />to such agencies for review and comment. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of any excavation <br />activities, the City will contact the Underground Service Alert to notify the affected utility/energy <br />purveyors who can place their personnel at the excavation site to assist in the location of underground <br />Draft I November 2017 3-28 Environmental Consequences <br />75A-57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.