My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH BRISTOL ST MEMORY LN PROJECT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
12/05/2017
>
75A - PH BRISTOL ST MEMORY LN PROJECT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 5:34:02 PM
Creation date
11/30/2017 7:30:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75A
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 <br />MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST <br />Draft 1 November 2017 2 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist <br />75A-65 <br />New Impacts of Proposed <br />Previous FEISIEIR <br />Project Changes <br />No <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />After1999 <br />Mitigation <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Impacts <br />Disclosed? <br />Subsequent or <br />Supplemental EIR <br />Required? <br />1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a <br />scenic vista? <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />b) Substantially damage scenic resources, <br />including, but not limited to, trees, rock <br />outcroppings, and historic buildings within <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />a state scenic highway? <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />c) Substantially degrade the existing visual <br />character or quality of the site and its <br />surroundings? <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />d) Create a new source of substantial light <br />or glare, which would adversely affect day <br />or nighttime views in the area? <br />2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique <br />Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide <br />Importance (Farmland), as shown on the <br />maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />Mapping and Monitoring Program of the <br />California Resources Agency, to non- <br />agricultural use? <br />— <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />b) Conflict with existing zoning for <br />agricultural use, or a Williamson Act <br />contract? <br />--...... —_....... . <br />c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or <br />cause rezoning, of, forest land (as defined <br />in Public Resources Code section <br />12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public <br />Resources Code section 4526), or <br />X <br />YESNO <br />timberland zoned Timberland Production <br />(as defined by Government Code section <br />51104(g))? <br />----....------..._. <br />®� <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />d) Result in the loss of forest land or <br />conversion of forest land to non -forest <br />use? <br />e) Involve other changes in the existing <br />environment which, due to their location or <br />nature, could result in conversion of <br />Farmland, to non-agricultural use or <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />conversion of forest land to non -forest <br />use? <br />3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: <br />a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation <br />of the applicable air quality plan? <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />b) Violate any air quality standard or <br />contribute substantially to an existing or <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />projected air quality violation? <br />Draft 1 November 2017 2 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist <br />75A-65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.