Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2-3 <br /> <br />5. Monthly adjustment factors to account for variations of parking demand over <br />the year. <br />The shared parking demand for individual rates takes into account the peak parking <br />characteristics of the hotel, restaurant, and lounge/bar uses. These land uses have <br />different peaking characteristics with respect to the time of day and the month of <br />the year. Adjustments have been made to take into consideration both weekday <br />and weekend peak conditions, based upon the individual types of uses. The latest <br />ULI procedures also separate visitor versus employee parking demand for each land <br />use. <br />2.3 Shared Parking Calculations <br />As described in the above section, the ULI Shared Parking Model was used to <br />evaluate the peak parking demand at the proposed 2129 North Main Street Hotel <br />Project. The data provided in the model for monthly variations of parking demand <br />by land use, different peaking characteristics between weekday and weekend <br />parking demand, and hourly distribution of peak parking demand for each land use <br />is accounted for in the analysis. <br />The ULI Shared Parking model also proportions the parking rates between visitors <br />and employees for weekday and weekend conditions, each with their own parking <br />demand characteristics. <br />The City of Santa Ana Parking Code requires one (1) parking space per room plus 1 <br />parking space per each ten (10) rooms for hotel use. It should be noted that the <br />City of Santa Ana Parking Code for hotel use is considered conservative when <br />compared to other similar jurisdictions which typically require one (1) parking space <br />per room. <br />Typically, the ULI Shared Parking Model utilizes the ULI-established parking rates for <br />each land use. However, to reflect the City of Santa Ana’s more stringent parking <br />rates, RK has modified the parking rates within the ULI model to reflect the City of <br />Santa Ana’s Parking Code for each individual land use. This approach yields a more <br />conservative parking demand analysis when compared to the typical ULI- <br />recommended model. <br /> <br />5-44