My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2017
>
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2017 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
12/18/2017 4:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-077
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements —Project No. 17-6883 <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures H-1 through H-3 <br />and H-5 through H-7. <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. <br />e) Create objectionable odorsrffecting asubstmetialmunber ofpeople7 <br />Construction activities associated with the proposed Project may generate detectable odors from heavy-duty <br />construction equipment and exhaust Odors associated with diesel and gasoline fumes are transitory in nature and <br />would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The impacts from these odors would <br />be short-term, would cease upon Project completion, and are not anticipated to be significant Implementationofthe <br />proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. <br />This section cohresponds with the 1990 FEIS/EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mdigation <br />Akasures, SubsectionE,SireambedAlodoicotion. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect either directly or through habitat modifications; on any species <br />identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or <br />regulatdons, or by the Caldfornia Depmbnent of Fish and Gane or US Fish and Wddtdfe Service? <br />The Project site is located within a highly -urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. No sensitive natural habitat <br />or special -status species exist on or in the vicinity of the proposed Project Implementation of the proposed Project <br />would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any rdpmian habitat or other sensitive natural communhy <br />identified in Local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the CaVornia Deportment of Fish <br />andCnme or US Fish and Wddhfe Service? <br />Refer to Response 3.4m). No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are identified in the Project <br />vicinity. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the <br />1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands us defused by Section 404 of the <br />Clean Water Act linchsding, bad sat limited to, morfshg vernal pool coastal etc) through direct <br />removal filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? <br />Refer to Response 3.4m). No federally protected wetlands are identified in the Project area or vicinity. The <br />proposed Project is located within a highly -urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana. Implementation of the <br />proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Final I December 2017 3-7 Environmental Consequences <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.