My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2017
>
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2017 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
12/18/2017 4:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-077
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements —Project No. 17-6883 <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />aq Interfere substantaIIy wi k the movement of my native resident or migraoryfuh or Wdlafe species <br />or wi k established nave resident or migratory wedhfe corridors, or impede the use of native <br />wildlife nursery sites? <br />As the proposed Project is located within a highly -urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana, the Project would not <br />interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, corridors, or impede the use <br />of native wildlife nursery sites, as time are located within the Project area. Implementation of the proposed Project <br />would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />e) Confect with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree <br />preservation policy or ordinance? <br />The proposed Project may result in the removal of existing landscaping including trees. As such, removal or <br />planting of trees is required to comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 33, Article VII, <br />Regulation ofthe Pleading, Mmnferxmce, and Removal of Trees. With compliance with the City's Municipal Code, <br />the proposed Project would not conflict with the City's tree ordinance Implementation of the proposed Project <br />would notresult in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable. <br />Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures arerequired. <br />,n Conflict wdh the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Pliny Natural Community <br />ConservatlonPlary or other approvedlocal. regional orstae habitacomervadoaplan? <br />The Project site is not located within a habitat conservation plan. Implementation of the proposed Project would not <br />result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES <br />This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />Akasures, Subsection T, Cultural Resources. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Cause a substantia adverse change in the signirwavice of a historical resource in defined in <br />§]5064.5? <br />No structure modification would result with implementation of the Project Furthermore, the proposed Project <br />would only require limited depths of excavations (maximum depth of 10 feet). Although the majority of excavation <br />is anticipated to occur in non-native fill materials, should unknown potential historical resources be uncovered, <br />implementation of mitigation measure T-1 in the previously approved 1990 FEIS/EIR would reduce impacts to less <br />than significant levels. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than <br />previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Final I December 2017 3-8 Environmental Consequences <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.