My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2017
>
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2017 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
12/18/2017 4:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-077
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements —Project No. 17-6883 <br />b) ConJGct wth an applicable plm5 policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the <br />emissions ofgreenhouce gases? <br />In December 2015, the City of Santa Ana adopted the Climate Action Plan (CAP) as a commitment to improving <br />quality of life by reducing carbon pollution and energy use, both from its own operations and from the community <br />as a whole To develop this CAP, an inventory was conducted to determine baseline GHG emissions from the <br />community and from municipal operations for calendar year 2008. A forecast was made of business -as -usual <br />emissions in the absence of any emissions reduction actions. This forecast was then adjusted to account for the <br />emissions reduction expected from statewide policies and from actions that have already been taken by the City <br />since the baseline inventory. Based on community input, suggestions from City staff, analysis of other <br />communities' climate action plans, and consultant recommendations, a list of measures to reduce emissions was <br />developed. Reaching the emissions reduction goals will require residents, businesses, and City govemment to wodc <br />together. The result will be reduced traffic congestion, improved air quality, lower energy use and cost, and <br />improved quality of life for the entire community. The following measures from the CAP are applicable to the <br />proposed Project: <br />• Traffic Signal Synchronization Program: Coridors with synchronized and coordinated traffic signals tend <br />to have shorter travel times, less delay, and reduced congestion. These factors combine reduced fuel usage <br />and emissions. Improvements of intersection operations would help achieve City reduction goals by <br />reducing idling emissions, decreasing congestion and improving traffic flow. <br />• Design Guidelines for Intemal Pedestrian Connectivity: Intemal pedestrian connections such as a sidewalk <br />within a site are an important factor in facilitating non -automotive travel. The level of connectivity relates <br />to the ability to travel within the site to other locations without having to use vehicles or an extemal <br />roadway network which decrease emissions. <br />As noted above, the Project would widen the Bristol Street ROW to accommodate a planned roadway/intersection <br />improvement The Project would improve traffic flow, reduce idling emissions, thereby reducing GHG emissions. <br />The proposed Project would not conflict with the CAP because it would not increase GHG emissions. The Project <br />would also implement the appliance CAP measures noted above and would further decrease emissions through <br />traffic signal synchronization and the design of an internal pedestrian sidewalk. The Project modifications would <br />not conflict with CAP reduction targets. <br />Additionally, the proposed Project would not conflict with applicable plans, policy, or regulations adopted for the <br />purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG. The proposed Project would result in improved traffic flow, reduced <br />vehicle idling times, and congestion. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in new impacts <br />pertaining to GHG emissions. <br />Certifled 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. <br />3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS <br />This section coresponds with the 1990 FEIS/EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />Akarures, Subsection V, Construction Impacts, and Subsection X, Hazardous Materials. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine trampor5 use, or <br />disposal ofhayardous materials? <br />The proposed intersection improvements would require relocation of curb/gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, <br />and both public and private utilities (including the existing traffic signal). Any removal of roadway pavement <br />striping will be required to be surveyed for lead-based paint prior to removal, in compliance with the applicable <br />local, state, and federal regulations administered through the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health. <br />Final I December 2017 3-13 Environmental Consequences <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.