My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2017
>
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2017 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
12/18/2017 4:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-077
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements —Project No. 17-6883 <br />Certifled 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />C) Coahet with any applicable habitatconservation plan or natural community conservation plaut? <br />The Project site is not a part of any habitat conservation plan, and is located within a highly -urbanized area within <br />the City of Santa Ana. The proposed Project would not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural <br />community. No impact is anticipated. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 <br />FEIS/EIR. <br />Certifled 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />Akasures, Subsection W, Consumption of Renewable and Non -Renewable Resources. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Result in the loss of avaiabltlty of ak nmvn mineral resource ofvalue to the region and the residents <br />of the state? <br />The Project site is currently developed and does not contain any areas that are utilized for the extraction of mineral <br />resources. Furthermore, the proposed Project would not involve excavation that would likely identify previously <br />unidentified mineral resources. No impact to mineral resources would result from the proposed Project Impacts <br />would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. <br />Certifled 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. <br />b) Result in the loss of avalabr7ity, of a locally -imported mineral resource recovery site delineated on a <br />loealgeneral play specific plan or other land me plan? <br />The Project site is curenfly developed and is not delineated as a mineral resources recovery site by the City's <br />General Plan. Implementation of the proposed Project would have no impact on the mineral resources and no <br />mitigation measures are necessary. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 <br />FEIS/EIR. <br />Certifled 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable <br />Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures arerequired. <br />3.12 NOISE <br />This section coresponds with the 1990 FEIS/EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation <br />Akasures, Subsection I, Mire, and Subsection V, Condructionlapaciv <br />Would the project result in: <br />a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local <br />general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? <br />Final I December 2017 3-20 Environmental Consequences <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.