2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact

Home Browse Search

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements -Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST Final I December 2017 2 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigabon 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X scenic vista? YES NO b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock X YES NO outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality ofthe site and its X YES NO surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light ---- or glare, which would adversely affect day X YES NO or nighttime views in the area? 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland X YES NO Mapping and Monitoring Program ofthe California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for ...................... agricultural use, or a Williamson Act X YES NO contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public X YES NO Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(8))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or - --- conversionofforestlandtonon-forest X YES NO use? e) Involve other changes in the existing ....... environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of X YES NO Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation X YES NO ofthe applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or X YES NO projected air quality violation? Final I December 2017 2 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist