2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact

Home Browse Search

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements -Project No. 17-6883 MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST Final I December 2017 3 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR Project Changes No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required? Mitigabon c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state X YES NO ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to ............ substantial pollutant concentrations? X YES NO e) Create objectionable odors affecting a - --- substantialnumberofpeople? X YES NO 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local X YES NO or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or X YES NO regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? .. .................__. --------------- ......... .... c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act (including but not limited to, marsh, vernal X YES NO pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with X YES NO established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, X YES NO such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Final I December 2017 3 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist