My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2017
>
2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2017 2:34:15 PM
Creation date
12/18/2017 4:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-077
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements -Project No. 17-6883 <br />MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST <br />Final I December 2017 6 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist <br />New Impacts ofProposed <br />Premous FEISIEIR <br />Project Changes <br />No <br />Less Than <br />Less Than <br />Potentially <br />Impacts <br />Subsequent or <br />Impact <br />Significant <br />Significant <br />Significant <br />Disclosed? <br />Supplemental EIR <br />Impact <br />After 1990 <br />Impact <br />Required? <br />Mitigabon <br />e) For a project located within an airport <br />land use plan or, where such a plan has <br />not been adopted, within two miles of a <br />public airport or public use airport, would <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />the project result in a safety hazard for <br />people residing or working in the project <br />area? <br />f) For a project within the vicinity of a <br />private airstrip, would the project result in a <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />safety hazard for people residing or <br />working in the project area? <br />g) Impair implementation of or physically <br />interfere with an adopted emergency <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />response plan or emergency evacuation <br />plan? <br />h) Expose people or structures to a <br />significant risk of loss, injury or death <br />involving wildland fires, including where <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas <br />or where residences are intermixed with <br />wildlands? <br />9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY <br />Would the project: <br />a) Violate any water quality standards or <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />waste discharge requirements? <br />b) Substantially deplete groundwater <br />supplies or interfere substantially with <br />groundwater recharge such that there <br />would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or <br />a lowering ofthe local groundwater table <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />level (e.g, the production rate of pre- <br />existing nearby wells would drop to a level <br />that would not support existing land uses <br />or planned uses for which permits have <br />been granted)? <br />c) Substantially alter the existing drainage <br />pattern ofthe site or area, including <br />through the alteration ofthe course of a <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />stream or river, in a manner that would <br />result in substantial erosion or siltation on - <br />or off-site? <br />Final I December 2017 6 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.