Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements -Project No. 17-6883 <br />MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST <br />Final I December 2017 10 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist <br />New Impacts ofProposed <br />Premous FEISIEIR <br />Project Changes <br />No <br />Less Than <br />Less Than <br />Potentially <br />Impacts <br />Subsequent or <br />Impact <br />Significant <br />Significant <br />Significant <br />Disclosed? <br />Supplemental EIR <br />Impact <br />After 1990 <br />Impact <br />Required? <br />Mitigabon <br />b) Does the project include recreational <br />facilities or require the construction or <br />expansion of recreational facilities that <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />might have an adverse physical effect on <br />the environment? <br />16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Conflict with an applicable plan, <br />ordinance or policy establishing measures <br />of effectiveness for the performance of the <br />circulation system, taking into account all <br />modes of transportation including mass <br />transit and non -motorized travel and <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />relevant components ofthe circulation <br />system, including but not limited to <br />intersections, streets, highways and <br />freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, <br />and mass transit? <br />b) Conflict with an applicable congestion <br />management program, including, but not <br />limited to level of service standards and <br />travel demand measures, or other <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />standards established by the county <br />congestion management agency for <br />designated roads or highways? <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, <br />including either an increase in traffic levels <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />or a change in location that results in <br />substantial safety risks? <br />d) Substantially increase hazards due to a <br />design feature (e.g, sharp curves or <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />dangerous intersections) or incompatible <br />uses (e.g, farm equipment)? <br />e) Result in inadequate emergency <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />access? <br />f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or <br />programs regarding public transit, bicycle, <br />or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />decrease the performance or safety of <br />such facilities? <br />Final I December 2017 10 Appendix A -Mod ified Initial Study Checklist <br />