Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana RFP 17-072 1 Statement of Qualifications (Revised 11/9/17) ' <br />Figure 4: Phase 1 Key Activities & [Deliverables <br />saanit7aP_. 11. 1 ...... .. assteH <br />Roadmap <br />This section of the proposal highlights how specific activities in the Roadmap portion of Phase 1 align to <br />the description of work in the RFP, <br />Process Documentation <br />The first major area in the scope of work is to document all relevant As -Is Agency business processes. <br />The initial effort during the Baseline & Benchmark sub -phase is to collect, consolidate and assess <br />relevant process manuals, documentation and procedures. This will be done through interviews with <br />subject matter experts, stakeholder interviews/surveys and review of available documentation. The goal <br />will be to prepare for the current state roundtables (process review workshops), including identifying the <br />structure of the workshops and most appropriate participants. <br />We will conduct several workshops throughout the Business Processes Assessment and Implementation, <br />Identifying opportunities for standardization and optimization of business processes. The initial goal of <br />the first process review workshops, called the current state roundtables, is to understand the current state <br />to a level well enough to identify the key inputs, outputs and hand-offs within the existing processes <br />across the Agency. <br />Chazey Partners classifies processes by their level of detail, between level 1 (function) and level 5 <br />(desktop procedures). Whether a given sub -process is at a particular level depends on each clients <br />operating environment, particularly if attempting to distinguish between levels 3 and 4. Simple processes <br />may not need all five levels of granular detail. The levels of process documentation are illustrated in the <br />attachments on page 32. <br />It is important at this stage to not try to document to level 5 (desktop procedures) as the concern is falling <br />Into the trap of "process mapping for the sake of process mapping'. This is where organizations spend a <br />significant amount of effort mapping current state processes to a high-level of precision, having no clear <br />roadmap on how to action change, and eventually filing the process maps away for future reference. We <br />avoid this trap through having clear goals and methodologies for each phase of process mapping, <br />matching the level of detailed mapping to the specific goals of the activity. <br />The process maps are leveraged and revisited throughout the transformation journey. The initial As -Is <br />process maps are typically developed to level 3. These maps highlight the end-to-end flow, location - <br />specific requirements and the necessary hand-offs. A key design goal is to identify ways to standardize <br />the process as much as possible across the organization to gain productivity efficiencies. <br />Chazey Partners Revised per email communication request 10/31/17 <br />20A-44 <br />