My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
60E - SENIOR RENTAL COMMUNITY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
05/01/2018
>
60E - SENIOR RENTAL COMMUNITY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2018 6:54:14 PM
Creation date
4/26/2018 6:40:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
60E
Date
5/1/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPR No. 2017-08/DBA No..2017-01 <br />September 11, 2017 <br />Page 5 <br />Issue•.or To is <br />Question <br />Analysis <br />Consistency with the <br />Does the project meet the <br />Although the project complies with many 'development <br />MEMU development <br />MEMU regulating plan's <br />standards enumerated in the MEMU regulating plan, it does <br />standards <br />development standards, or <br />not meet the requirements for publicly -accessible open <br />does it require approval of <br />space, building setbacks, and driveway widths. These <br />deviations? <br />standards require approval of incentives/waivers through the <br />Density Bonus. Agreement.' application. Moreover, although <br />slated as a guWeline,in the regulating plan, the unit sizes are <br />well below the 1,200 -square -foot average unit size objective.. <br />The applicant has considered this guideline and proposes;lo <br />compensate through a greater average.,pdvstelcommon open <br />space area of 112 square feet per unit instead of the 100- <br />square-fdot minimum.. In addition, .the proposed parking rate <br />of 015 spaces,per unit is well below the required 2,0 spaces. <br />per unit; however, the applicant is exercising his ability under' <br />AB 744 to provide 0.5 spaces per unit due to the,project site's <br />proximity to two.bus stops with frequent, service. These.siops, <br />are on lines that connect the project site to points west <br />(central Santa Ana, Garden Grove, and Westminster), north <br />(Tustin, Orange, and Placentia), and east (central Tustin). <br />Compatibility with <br />Will the project be well- <br />The proposed development consists of a single six -level <br />adjacent <br />Integrated into the existing <br />project surrounded by single -story structures to the east and <br />development in terms <br />MEMU area and surrounding <br />west. A two-story multiple -family residential community abuts <br />of similarity in scale, <br />development patterns, <br />the site to the 'south, and a single -story commercial <br />height, and site <br />including those in the city of <br />development is to the north across First Street. Although the <br />configuration <br />Tustin? <br />MEMU anticipates developments of this scale. or larger In the <br />"Active Urban" land use district, this development would be <br />the first of its size in its Immediate vicinity. Several design <br />features have been incorporated into the project to break up <br />its massing and to lessen its impacts on adjacent properties. <br />These include breaking up the building's west elevation <br />through courtyards, setting back the building from the east, <br />south, and west through a minimum 20 -foot wide fire lane, <br />and the planting of rapidly -growing eucalyptus trees with <br />minimum 20 -foot brown trunk height throughout, Finally, the <br />proposal to construct a single structure instead of several is. <br />the result of the site's odd shape. Development on the site is <br />further complicated and constrained because the neighboring <br />parcel, although underutilized, is located in the jurisdiction of <br />the City of Tustin. <br />Compatible and <br />_ <br />Does the project, as <br />The proposed project is intended to be a low -impart use: No <br />harmonious land <br />proposed, contribute <br />negative impacts from noise, air quality, aesthetics, or traffic <br />use(s), site design, <br />positively to tile area in which <br />are expected except for temporary impacts arising during <br />and operational <br />it is located? <br />construction of the project. The site's design is intended to <br />standards <br />activate its frontage on First Street by providing flexible <br />community areas that can be, programmed with activities or <br />temporary uses; and the landscape palette has been <br />carefully selected to minimize the site's impact on the <br />surrounding low-rise land uses: <br />60t527 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.