Laserfiche WebLink
d I -bUZ JUN ZY <br />adequate capacity to resist in-plane forces excePt that Preliminary <br />calculations indicate the gq;sibility of higher than allowable shear stresses <br />in the north wall of room (9). <br />The fol lowing structures, which are independent of the building' have <br />unreinforced masonry elements that u,ould develop tension stresses due to the <br />Ordinance requi red design forces and thus do not comply: <br />'1. The arcade piers due to forces normal to the line <br />of a rches . <br />The arbor piers north of the Patio. <br />The trel I is columns northeast of the bui ld in9. <br />North, west and east walls of the pavilion at the <br />north end of the arcade. <br />5. The following parts of the campanile: <br />a. The walls around the bel I receSs. <br />forces normal to theThe arched butt resses for <br />buttresses. <br />b <br />IMPL I CAT IONS OF F IND INGS <br />The strengthening of the roof of Room <br />may be done over the existing roof and <br />Bracing for the arcade piers, the l4 feet high freestanding wall north of the <br />exteri;r stairway, arbor piers, trellis columns' the Pavilion walls, and the <br />arched buttresses of the campanile wi ll probably have to be exposed and may <br />be accomplished by use of buttresses matching the style of existing buttresses. <br />other strengthening work can probably be done without disruption of historic <br />fea tures of the bu i I d i n9 , <br />lf you have any questions regarding this report, please donrt hesitate to <br />contact us. <br />Very truly yours ' <br />e <br />2u.-# <br />h <br />3 od#'JSJtees o <br />) <br />3. <br />ll. <br />\,Jork to brace walls v,,ith excessive height or length ratios will require removal <br />and restoration of historic finishes. <br />and bracing the adjacent ParaPets <br />concea I ed by the paraPets. <br />Kariotis