|
CDSG and ARAM Pavement Rehabilitation Tho task Included a total of 42 streets, and had stdot budget, funding, and
<br />scheduling components. T46 City needed a consultant who couldanalym goveral alternative pavement rehabllitagon
<br />strategies under a limited construction budget, while sill) meeting the requited project guidelines to obtain funding.
<br />Improvements entailed grind end overlay of all straats;in both bid packages, with the use of an Asphalt Rubber and
<br />Aggregate Membrane (ARAM) interlayer, with localized areas of full -depth remove and replace. Kimley-Horn assisted the
<br />City to meet requirements fora grant from the. Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (Gal Recycle) and the
<br />Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) federal funding program. Klmloy Hom's knowledge of new and Innovative
<br />pavement reha6111tation strategies has helped the City utiliza recyclad materials and to -place recycling methods, which
<br />has broughtthe CityeeVerel funding opportunitles and millions of dollars In construction cost savings.
<br />Cl lent Reference: City 0iwnntana, Kalfh Kramet, Pukllc Works Manager, 909,36.0.6644
<br />West Grove Valley Pipelines, Riverview Pipelines, Santa Ana, CA (Hazen and Sawyer)
<br />Two projects with the City of Santa Ana included a total of over 17,000 Linear Feet ofwater pipeline design ranging in
<br />size from &,inch to 12-inch diameter. The City Is actively replacing aging and undersized water melns.throughout their
<br />distribution -system, The West Grove Valley project included 9,600 Linear Feet of pipeline replacement design. The
<br />Riverview project Included 7,700 Linear Fast of pipeline replacement design,
<br />Client Reference: City of Santa Ana, Public Works Agency, 4mando Fernandez; Ptbjoot Manager, 714.647,5680
<br />Well 29 Improvements Alternatives Analysis, Santa Ana, CA (Hazen and Sawyer)
<br />TheCity of Santa Ana owns and operates Well 29, located at the southeast corner of Flower Street and First Street;
<br />adjacent to City owned tennis courts. Well 29 pumps directly to an existing 6 MG reservoir, The existing well site includes
<br />the well head end discharge, piping assembly,. control equipment, a chlorination system in a building, and an SCE
<br />transformer. An alternatives analysis was conducted to recommend, upgrades at the site Including site improvements,
<br />structural, mechanical, and electrical upgrades. Highlights of the study Include developing three alternatives for the
<br />Improved site, providing 30 renderings for each site alternative, and developing a preliminary opinion of probable
<br />cost for the design and construction of each alternative discussed. The City Is moving forward with implementing the
<br />recommended alternative from this analysis,
<br />Client Reference: City of S.antaAno, Public Works Agency -.Water Resources D vision, Brian Igo, Assistant Engineer,
<br />714,647.3385
<br />References
<br />We have provided client references in the previous section and below, We invite you to contact these recent clients and
<br />ask them about our work history, quality of service, and whether they would again select us for similar services.
<br />Mr. Carlos Castellanos, City Engineer, City of Anaheim
<br />TEL: 714.765.6176 (On -Call Planning and Engineering projects)
<br />Mr.. Keith Kramer, Public Works Manager. City of Fontana
<br />TEL:909,350.6044 (On -Call Pavement RehabilltationlUtllily Design Projects)
<br />Mr. Jason Lee, Project Manager, Orange County Transportation Agency
<br />TEL: 714.660.6282 (On -Call Transportation Engineering projects)
<br />Kinglet') Horn ra TROC77P26,rnCity ofSanta Ana
<br />s
<br />
|