My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (GENERAL COMMENTS)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (GENERAL COMMENTS)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:38:42 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 11:32:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, <br />AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street <br />February 5, 2019 <br />Page 12 <br />A Planning Commission study session was conducted on August 27, 2018 where staff presented information <br />on the project description, the draft environmental impact report, entitlements, vicinity, building heights, <br />access options, unit mix, parking, and areas of consideration. The applicant also provided a presentation <br />that overviewed the project, amenities, community benefits, concerns and support, traffic, changes made <br />by the applicant to the project, and project benef ts. �hirty-two (32) verbal comments were received (three <br />in support and 29 in opposition) and nine written comments were received (one in support and eight in <br />Opposition).[ _ <br />On September 5, 2018, the developer, members of North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance, and City planning <br />staff met to discuss the proposed project. A list of questions, comments and concerns were raised by the <br />neighborhood. in follow up on September 24, 2018, information requested at the previous meeting was <br />provided by staff to members of the North Santa Ana Presentation Alliance. ----------------------- <br />Most__________________ ___ <br />`vlost recently, on November 26, 2018 khe public hearing for the project was continued to January 14, 2019 <br />and a second study session was conducted where staff presented information on the project, the Draft EIR, <br />comments received, the Final EIR and draft development agreement terms. The applicant also played a <br />video overviewing the project. During public comments 58 verbal comments were received (25 in support; <br />31 in opposition and two neutral) and 11 written comments were received (two in support and nine in <br />opposition). One comment letter on the DEIR from Lozeau Drury LLP was received and written response to <br />the comments was drafted (Exhibit 6). <br />Density <br />The revised project has reduced the density from 87 dwelling units per acre to 84 dwelling units per acre or <br />a floor area ratio of 2.21. Per the General Plan, the maximum floor area ratio of the subject property and <br />the properties to the north and west is 1.5 and the maximum dwelling units per acre of the residential <br />properties to the east and west is 7 dwelling units per acre. As proposed, the project has higher density and <br />floor area ratio than the surrounding properties. With the staff recommended changes to the project, the <br />maximum density of the project will be further reduced to 81 dwelling units per acre which is within the <br />range of densities approved for other multi -family projects in the City. <br />ommented [DH40]: This meeting was <br />cheduled 20 days Into a 45 day review <br />period for the DEUR. The review period was <br />even extended due to the comments that <br />needed to be made. It is no wonder only <br />32 people expressed verbal comments. <br />Commented [DH41J: What is not <br />mentioned Is the continued concern of <br />density. We were told that <br />Commented [DH42J: No mention of the <br />October22,2019 Planning Commission <br />meeting where several people voiced the <br />objection to the move to have a special <br />Planning Commission meeting on <br />November5'h. <br />Mable 5: Project Density Compared to Approved Apartment Projects - Commented [DH43J: BIG DIFFERENCE <br />HERE, NONE ofthese projects are adjacent <br />Density Zone o single family homes, except the proposed <br />roject. <br />Projects <br />The Nineteen0l <br />49 du/ac <br />Metro -East Mixed Use Overlay <br />1901 East First Street <br />nConstruction <br />The Line <br />58 du/ac <br />Harbor Mixed Use Specific PlanThe <br />3630 Westminster Avenue <br />Heritage2001 <br />du/ac <br />Specific Development No. 88 <br />Under Construction <br />East Dyer Road65 <br />The Marke <br />74 du/ac <br />Specific Development No. 76 <br />Constructed <br />100 East MacArthur Boulevard <br />Prisma (301)301 <br />du/ac <br />Specific Development No. 59 <br />Constructed <br />East Jeanette Lane91 <br />75E-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.