Laserfiche WebLink
5.0 Environmental Setting 5.3 Cultural/Historical Resources <br />Avion Project SEIR <br />Page 5.3-12 <br />California Register of Historical Resources. It was also determined that CA-SDI-18,429 does not <br />qualify as a significant historical resource under any of the six criteria in the current City guidelines. <br />Furthermore, it was also determined that CA-SDI-18,429 does not qualify as an important <br />archaeological site under Division 2, Article 3, of the San Diego Municipal Code, because of its <br />relatively limited variety and density of artifacts and the disturbed nature of the deposit. Recovered <br />material was subsequently curated at the SDAC. <br />c. Isolates <br />All three isolates (RDS-1, RDS-2, and HJP-1) are located within the proposed development footprint <br />and would be disturbed by proposed grading. However, cultural isolates generally lack <br />characteristics that would qualify them for listing on the CRHR, and therefore, are not considered <br />significant historical resources. Similarly, isolates are not considered significant under the City’s <br />historic resource guidelines. <br />d. Other Sites <br />RDS-3 <br />As described in Section 5.3.2.2.a above, the seven flakes were found in the vicinity of CA-SDI-18,428 <br />during the 2017 survey and RDS-3 have been included in the expanded boundary of that site. <br />Therefore, potential impacts to these resources are included in the impact analysis for CA-SDI- <br />18,428. <br />HJP-2 <br />This lithic scatter site is not within the proposed development area and would not be impacted by <br />the project. <br />RDS-4 <br />The historic structure and associated road are not within the proposed development area and <br />would not be impacted by the project. Therefore, no further work on this historical resource was <br />required. <br />HJP-3 <br />The known components of HJP-3 lack sufficient integrity to be eligible for inclusion on the CRHR or <br />for inclusion on the City HRR. None of the original buildings still stand, and the remaining slabs, few <br />walls, and tank do not convey sufficient information of setting, feeling or association of the original <br />farmstead on their own. The remaining elements also do not exhibit sufficient design or <br />construction characteristics to be eligible themselves. However, project construction may unearth <br />subsurface deposits associated with the farmstead, which could potentially be significant historical <br />resources under criterion 4 for inclusion on the CRHR and under criterion a for inclusion on the City <br />HRR.