Laserfiche WebLink
10.0 Project Alternatives <br />Avion Project SEIR <br />Page 10-2 <br />Table 10-1 <br />Comparison of Project and Alternatives Impacts Summary <br />Environmental Issue Area Project <br />No Project <br />(No Development) <br />Alternative <br />Reduced Development <br />Footprint Alternative <br />Land Use Significant and mitigated Less than the Project Greater than the <br />Project <br />Biological Resources Significant and mitigated Less than the Project Less than the Project <br />Cultural/Historical Resources Significant and mitigated Less than the Project Similar to the Project <br />Landform Alteration/ <br />Visual Quality Significant and unavoidable Less than the Project <br />Less than the Project, <br />but still significant and <br />unavoidable <br />Air Quality Significant and mitigated Less than the Project Less than the Project <br />Noise Less than Significant Less than the Project Less than the Project <br /> <br />10.1 No Project (No Development) Alternative <br />10.1.1 Description <br />The No Project (No Development) Alternative would maintain the project site in its current condition <br />and would preserve the existing environmental setting (see Figure 2-2). <br />10.1.2 Analysis of the No Project (No Development) <br />Alternative <br />10.1.2.1 Land Use <br />No development would occur under the No Project (No Development) Alternative. Consequently, <br />this alternative would not require any deviations from the City’s Land Development Code (LDC), <br />Environmentally Sensitive Lands (ESL) ordinance, or the Historic Resource Regulations. Similarly, this <br />alternative would not conflict with the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP)/Multi-Habitat <br />Planning Area (MHPA). Therefore, impacts related to land use under the No Project (No <br />Development) Alternative would be less than the project. <br />10.1.2.2 Biological Resources <br />No grading or construction activities would occur under the No Project (No Development) <br />Alternative. Consequently, this alternative would not impact any sensitive vegetation communities or <br />wildlife species. Similarly, this alternative would not require an MHPA boundary line adjustment. <br />Therefore, impacts related to biological resources under the No Project (No Development) <br />Alternative would be less than the project.