Laserfiche WebLink
Santa Ana General Plan Update <br />CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement <br />Of Overriding Considerations -48- October 2021 <br />• GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. <br />• Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the <br />long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. <br />• Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following <br />components consistent with the proposed CAP: <br /> Administration and Staffing <br /> Finance and Budgeting <br /> Timelines for Measure Implementation <br /> Community Outreach and Education <br /> Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management <br /> Tracking Tools <br />Finding <br />Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid <br />or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These <br />changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby <br />finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore <br />adopted. <br />The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into <br />consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate <br />this impact to a less-than-significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, <br />technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment <br />opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as <br />discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines <br />§§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has <br />determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, <br />technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the <br />GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. <br />4. Noise <br />Impact 5.12-1: Construction activities associated with buildout of the plan area would <br />result in temporary noise increases at sensitive receptors. <br />Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.12, Noise, starting <br />on page 5.12-29 of the Updated Draft PEIR. <br />Implementation of Mitigation Measure N-1 would reduce potential noise impacts during <br />construction to the extent feasible. However, due to the potential for proximity of construction <br />activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects occurring simultaneously, and the <br />potential duration of construction activities, construction noise could result in a temporary