My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Pension Debt Refinancing Update and Underwriter Selection
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
05/18/2021 Regular
>
Item 23 - Pension Debt Refinancing Update and Underwriter Selection
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 4:32:45 PM
Creation date
8/21/2023 4:38:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
23
Date
5/18/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RFP No. 21-025 <br />EXHIBIT B <br />was drafted 10 years ago under different market conditions; and, was drafted as a warning and <br />in response to bad practices. <br />It is important to note that are several issues that the GFOA points out to which all agencies <br />should adhere to when issuing POBs (#1- #3). However, because of pension reforms and policy <br />changes by CaIPERS in recent years, as well as adaptation in the POB market, we believe that <br />these concerns have been addressed and warrant reconsideration in California. Each GFOA <br />concern is listed below, along with our response in italics. <br />1. POBs are complex instruments, which incorporate the use of GICs, swaps, or derivatives. <br />POBs should only be issued as plain vanilla fixed-rate bonds. <br />2. POBs are structured with "make -whole" calls, which make it more costly or difficult to <br />refund in the future (than traditional tax-exempt debt). <br />POBs are now structured with standard call features like traditional tax-exempt bonds. <br />3. POBs have been structured to incorporate annual normal costs, or in a manner that defers <br />principal payments or extends principal payments over a longer period than the actuarial <br />amortization period. <br />POBs should not include normal costs (except for annual pre -pay amount), nor be <br />structured with an extended repayment schedule -final maturity. <br />4. POBs increase a municipality's bonding capacity or turn a soft liability into a hard liability. <br />An agency's Ca1PERS UAL liability is considered "debt" by the courts in California and GASB <br />68. Moreover, UAL payments are fixed dollar payments, like a traditional loan, which <br />financed at a discount rate of 7.0%. POBs simply "refinance" your Ca1PERS liability at a <br />lower rate. <br />5. Invested POB proceeds might fail to earn more than the interest rate over the term of the <br />bonds, leading to increased liability for the government. <br />The financial impact of POBs is dependent upon two variables: 1) Borrowing Rate on the <br />Bonds and 2) Ca1PERS Investment Performance. POBs provide savings by refinancing UAL <br />payments at a taxable fixed rate, as opposed to blended rate for a portfolio of assets (50% <br />equities/22% fixed income 112% real estate 18% private equity/ 6% inflation assets /3% <br />liquidity). Invested POBs may lose value if the market declines soon after issuance. <br />It should be noted, if Ca1PERS underperforms the City's UAL will go up regardless if bonds <br />are issued. However, the issuance of bonds may reduce the annual financial impact of <br />losses from investment returns or policy changes made by the CaIPERS Board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.