Laserfiche WebLink
In Re <br /> <br />Hesolution No. llV4 <br /> <br />Approvin~ Assessment <br /> <br />Linwood & E.stside <br /> <br /> In Re <br /> <br />'Hesolution No. llV5 <br /> <br />Confirming Assessment <br />N. & S. Bristol Street. <br /> <br />Noel: <br /> <br />Absent -' <br /> <br />The Board of Trustees thereupon accept edthe bid mentioned <br />and awa~ded the ccntrac+ to Wells & Bracelet for the <br /> <br />or improvement as the l~eet ~e~on~ble bidder <br /> <br />at the price named' in t~ir bid. <br /> <br /> ~ustee ~p~n thereupon introduced a ~eol~ion <br />awaking the contract to Wells · Breee le~. ~e re~lution <br />was o~e~ed filed, read, concord, and passed by the <br />following vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes: ~uetees O.H.O~an, Geo. MePhee, Nat H. Neff, <br /> <br /> ~ueteea None. <br /> <br /> ~etee~C.I.B~E~llen. <br /> <br />This being the dly and hour set for the hearing of appeals <br />or protests of any person or persons interested in the <br />ir~rovement or assessment made therefor, on Linwood Avenue <br />and Eastside Avenue, and no person appearing to protest <br />against any of the proceedings taken, the Clerk repasted <br />that no written protests hsd been filed. ~he Clerk also <br />reported that the Superintendent of Streets filed a lette~ <br />with the Clerk prior to the time set for the hearing, <br />calling the Board's attention to certain clerical errors <br />in the diagram and assessment, and on motion of Trustee <br />Neff, duly seconded and carrie~ the Board found that tbs <br />clerical errors did exist in the assessment and diagram <br />directed the Su~rintendent of Streets to modify and corre~ <br />the said errors as set out in his communication. <br /> <br /> The Superintendent of Streets r~ported that ke hsd <br />modified and corrected t~e assessment and diaFram pursuemt <br />to the order of tlc Board and the Boardnow being satisfie <br />with tbs correctness of the assessment, on motion of <br />Neff, seconded by Chapman and carried, resolution confirm- <br />ing the assessment as modified, wes passed by the followin <br /> <br />vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes: <br /> <br />Noes: <br /> <br />Absent: <br /> <br />Trustees C.H. Ohspman, Geo. MoPhee, Nat H. <br /> ~. W. Tubbs. <br /> <br />Trustees None. <br /> <br /> Trustee C. L. Killen. <br /> <br />Neff, <br /> <br />This being the time and place fixed for hearing protests <br />or objections to the work. or assessment made to cover work <br />done and improvement made on a portion of Nor,th end South <br />Bristol Street, and it appearing that a protest had been <br />filed by E. G. Warner and ~rtie ~. Warner, the Bosrdpro- <br />ceeded to hear ~nd consider said Drotest. Said protest <br />was ~ly heard, considered, overruled and ~enied. Where- <br />upon Trustee Mol'bee introduced a resolution overruling <br />protest and oonfl~ing assessment for work done on Nox-th <br /> <br /> <br />