Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM <br />Bristol Stroet Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue <br />TABLE 2 PROJECT RELATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS <br />VOC <br />NOx <br />CO <br />S02 <br />PM10 <br />PMz.a <br />Demolition <br />9 <br />70 <br />44 <br /><1 <br />12 <br />3 <br />Trenching <br />5 <br />41 <br />19 <br /><1 <br />2 <br />2 <br />Grading <br />8 <br />60 <br />34 <br /><1 <br />6 <br />4 <br />Paving <br />3 <br />16 <br />11 <br /><1 <br />2 <br />1 <br />Maximum <br />9 <br />70 <br />44 <br /><1 <br />12 <br />4 <br />SCAQMD Threshold <br />75 <br />100 <br />550 <br />150 <br />150 <br />55 <br />Exceeds Threshold? <br />No <br />No <br />No <br />No <br />No <br />No <br />Source: Air Quality Assessment Report (URS 2013a) <br />Notes: VOC = volatile organic compounds; NOx = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; SOz = sulfur diokdo; PMio = particulate matter less <br />than less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter; PMzs = particulate matter less than less than or equal to 2.5 microns In diameter, <br />An assessment of regional emissions associated with the operations phase of the proposed Project was <br />also conducted which compared emissions with and without the proposed Project. Aix pollutant emissions <br />generated by roadway vehicles are quantified based on emissions rates that vary based on vehicle speed. <br />Because the proposed Project would increase the roadway capacity along Bristol Street, traffic congestion <br />would be alleviated and average vehicle speeds would increase along improved roadway segments. Table <br />3 shows the emissions that would occur with and without the proposed Project based on the average <br />vehicle speeds. As shown in Table 3, air pollutant emissions would be less under the With -Project <br />Alternative as opposed to the No Project Alternative due to the lower emission rates associated with <br />higher average vehicle speeds. The SCAQMD has established significance thresholds to determine <br />whether the operations phase of projects would result in significant impacts to regional air quality. The <br />proposed Project would result in air pollutant emissions which are below these significance thresholds <br />and would result in a beneficial impact on air pollutant emissions due to improvements in operational <br />phase efficiencies along Project roadway segments for the 2015 Project opening year. <br />Emissions occurring during the 2035 design year were also quantified based on the LOS, average vehicle <br />speed and emission rates that would occur with and without the proposed Project. As shown in Table 4, <br />air pollutant emissions occurring under the With -Project Alternative would be less than under the No <br />Project Alternative due to lower emission rates associated with higher average speeds. Consequently, the <br />Proposed Project for the 2035 Project design year would likewise result in emissions which are below the <br />SCAQMD's significance thresholds and would result in a beneficial impact relative to greenhouse gas <br />(GHG) emissions due to improvements in operational phase efficiencies along Project roadway segments. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No additional new mitigation measures are required. <br />TABLE 3 YEAR 2015 WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS <br />ROADWAY AVERAGE <br />INTERSECTION VEHICLE CO R06 NOX S0z PM16PM2A <br />SPEED <br />Year 2015 No Project <br />Bristol Street Between <br />Civic Center Drive and 13 69 5 12 0 2 2 <br />INashin ion Avenue <br />Year 2015 with Project <br />Bristol Street Between 25 45 2 8 0 1 1 <br />ANA 305-011 (PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01119/2015) YU PAGE 31 <br />