1955-04-04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

298 luti0n and the operation of the plant would not be harmful to the ~ health of the residents. On motion of Councilman Jerome, seconded~by Lateen and carried, the recom~nendation of the Planning Commission was approved and variance granted subject to the conditions as imposed by! In Re Variance Calland ~os. the Department of Public Works. On motion of Councilman Jerome, seconded by Dahl and carried, the recommendation of the Planning Commission was approved and variance granted to Calland Brothers to erect an 8' x 10~ temporary directional sign on property at 1302 Richland Street, to advertise the sale of houses in "Monta Vista Estates" at the corner of Monta Vista and Rait$ Streets, the sign to be clevated a minimum distance of 6' from the In Re Variance Norwood and DeLonge ground, and to remain for one year or less. On motion of Councilman Jerome, seconded by Dahl and carried, the recommendation of the Planning Commission was approved and variance granted to Norwood and DeLonge to permit erection of an 8' x l0~ temporary sign on property on the east side of Bristol Street, approx~ imately 450~ from the center of Bristol Street and Memory Lane, and also one 8~ x lC' sign on property on the south side of Memory Lane, approximately 600~ from the corner of Bristol Street and Memory Lane, the signs to be erected at lea. st 4~ off the ground and to remain for a In Re Variance ~dward J. Costello period of one year or less. Communication was read from the Planning Commission recommending denial of variance application of Edward J. Costello ~o permit the use of property at the southeast corner of Washington Avenue and Flower Street, 820 West Washington Avenue, for construction of a one-story professional office building, with off-street parking. Attorney Ridley C. Smith gave various reasons why the variance should be denied as recommended by the Planning Commission. The applicant stated the house, which more than fifty years old, would be removed, and the erection of the In Re 'Vaa'iance Santa Ana Lumber professional office building, with off-street parking would be a distinct asset to the neighborhood. On motion of Councilman Jerome, seconded by Dahl and ca~ried, the recommendation of the Planning Commission was approved and variance denied. Communication was read from the Planning Commission recommending granting of variance to permit the Santa Ana Lumber Company to use the next lot west of 1709 W. 3rd Street, for expansion of their lumber yard and lumber business facilities, adjoining this property on the west, which involves the s~ocking and storage of lumb~r, and eventuall~ the construction of additional storage sheds or other building facilities used in connection with the business, with a 3~ yard all around. Attorney Lester Van Tatenhove, representing the two property owners the north of this lot, stated reasons why the variance should be denied and objected to the side yard requirements being waived and requested that no machinery be housed on this lot and no storing of lumber be permitted. James Maynard, a representative of the Santa Aha Lumber Company requested permission to have the lumber stored, as re- quested in the variance, and have the storage sheds built on the southerly part of the lot. On motion of Councilman Jerome,