1956-11-05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

12,6' Hearing PlAnning Commission initiated amendment (Both sides Bristol from Santa Clara to Delhi Ro~u:l ) Hearing Amendment application Nathan Rubaloff (WaTnut and Bristol Streets) = ~ ~; Planning Co~nission initiated amendment (W.lst from Artesia to Birch Sts.) Bid acceptance Construction of pavement on .GarnSey' St&ap~ro~ately 335 ' .north ~f St.~ndrew~P1. Variance Earle~y~ ~L~ McColl~ et ux Variance Trued T. Pearson et ux This being the date set for hearing and no protests hav~g been received, the amendment appIication initiated by the Planning C~m~ission was considered for the reclassification of property located on both sides of Bristol Street, to a depth of 150 feet, from Santa Clara Avenue to Delhi Road, from R-1 to R-2 District, except between Fifth and Walnut Streets, where it is proposed to reclassify the property from R-2 to C-1-PK District, a~ modify the existing C-2 District by adding PK thereto. On motion of COUllc!lm~ N~rk~l, seconded by Heinly and carried, the amendment application was referred back to the Plamu!mg ¢.:,.,~dssion to determine more specifically the areas to be designated for the particular district. This being the date set for hearing and no protests having been received, the amendment was considered application of Nathan Rubaloff, et al,_/for the reclassification of two properties located at the northwest and southwest corners at the intersection of Walnut and Bristol Streets, with 145 feet fronting on Bristol Street and 170 feet fronting on Walnut Street be rezoned f~ R-2 to C-2-PK District; that the property located on both sides of Walnu Street, from a point 170 feet west of Bristol Street to the east line of Pacific Avenue be reclassified from R-2 to C-1-PK District. Nathan Rubaloff gave an explanation of his reclassification application. It was moved by Councilman Markel and seconded by Heinly that the amendment application of Nathan Rubaloff, et al, and the Planning C~mmfssion initiated ~nt for the reclassification of property located on the south side of Second Street and the north side of W~l~ut Street, from Artesia to Birch Streets, be refe~,~d back to the Planning Co~!ssion and Planning Director for recon- sideration. Thomas Shnen objected to the delsey caused by the referral of ~r. Rubaloff'. application and stated +.bat the majority of the property owners were in favor of the reclassification. MotiOn carried. On motion o£ Councilman Heinly, seconded by Markel and carried, a notice was ordered published setting the date of public hea~ing on December Srd, 1956, on amendment initia~ by the Planning Co,.,!ssion for the proposed reclassification of property on bo~h sides of West First Street from Artesia to Birch Streets, frc~ the R-2 and R-3 to the C-1-P~ and ¢-2-PK Districts, and for modification of existing C-1 and C-2 District by the addi- tion of. P.K. A tabulation of bids ~as presented by the Manager for the construction of pavement on Garnsey Street appro~m~tely 335 feet north of St. Andrew Place, as 'follows: R.J.Noble Company Total $5,174.00 10~ bond submitted $,l~y-M~ler Contracting Co. Total $5,54~.00 Certified check in the s~ of $600.00 On ~e~m, endation of the Manager and on motion of Counei!ma~ Markel, seconded by Neinly ordered returned. and. cai=i~ied, the bid of R.J.Noble C~mpany was accepted, the Other bid rejected aha check On motion of Counc~-~ Heinly, seconded by Markel and carried, the recommendation of the Plamuing Co~m~ssion was approved and the variance of Mawley L. and ~lice B. McColl~ granted to permit the construction of five duplexes, instead of triplexes, as requested, on property on the west side of Cedar Street, beginning at a point appro~m~tely 455 fee~ north of St. Andrew Street and continuing north approximately 428 feet, with attached garages,~ aceerding to plot plan, subject to conditions of Dep~Ad-ment of Public Works. On motion of Counc~lm-~ Heinly, seconded by Markel and carried, the rec~ndation of the Pl~-uing Commission was approved and the variance of Trued T. and Ethel J. Pearson graut~ to penn,it the use of e~e roma'of e~isti~g residence 'at 1247 So. Bristol Street, for a real estate~ ~ffice a~d~for general professio-~l ol~fic~ use,. with a ~11 ,slighted Sig~, subject t~.the conditions as 'imposed by the Commission and Department of Public Works and .the further conditions that 'si~ off.street parking spaces be provided, not to be on Bristol Street; that the pav~.ng on Wilshire be done within a period of one year an, the occupancy not be held up pending ~he pav~ improvement.