|
Hearing
<br />Amendment Plan. Com.
<br />Ordinance
<br /> ~/
<br />
<br /> Hearing
<br />"Delhi and Newport Annex"
<br />
<br />Bids
<br />Construction on
<br />E. 4th Street
<br />
<br />Variance
<br />Vahan Apelian
<br />
<br />Variance
<br />C. H. Brockman
<br />
<br />Variance
<br />Industrial Enterprises,
<br />IIlc.
<br />(reconsidered 12-3-56)
<br />
<br /> applicant's property should remain as R-1 District. On motion of Councilman Jerome,
<br /> seconded by Markel and carried, the recommendation of the Planning Commission was
<br /> and the amendment application of Lemon Heights Investment Corp., denied by the following
<br />
<br /> vote: Ayes, Councilman J. Ogden Markel, William Jerome, Tilghman A. Taylor,
<br /> Milford W. Dahl
<br /> Noes, Councilmen Dale H. Heinly
<br /> Absent, Councilmen None
<br /> .
<br /> This being the date set for hearing and no protests having been received, the amendment
<br /> initiated by the Planning Commission for the reclassification of property to the rear lot
<br /> lines on both sides of West First Street from Artesia to Birch Street, from ~the R-2 to
<br /> C-1-PK District, from the R-3 District to the C-2-PK District and for the modification of
<br /> the existing C-1 and C-2 Districts by the addition thereto of PK. On motion of Council-
<br /> man Heinly, seconded by Jerome and carried, the following Ordinance entitled:
<br />
<br /> "Ordinance amending Article IX of the Santa Aha Municipal Code creating
<br /> changes in district boundaries, and amending Sheets Nos. 16, 24, 29, 33
<br /> and 37 of the Districting Map to show the reclassification"
<br />
<br /> was introduced, considered and placed on file for second reading.
<br />
<br /> This being the date set for the hearing on the~aunexation designated "Delhi and Newport
<br /> Annex", on motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Markel and carried, the hearing was
<br />
<br /> continued until January 21st, 1957.
<br /> ,,
<br /> A tabulation of bids was presented by the Manager for the construction of pavement on
<br />
<br /> Fourth Street approximately 800 feet east of the Freeway, as follows: Total
<br /> Sully-Miller Contracting Cc~pany 1~i~,39~.i0 Certified check of $2,000.00
<br /> R. J. Noble Company 11,023.25 Bond of 10%
<br /> Griffith CompanV 12,153.90 Bond of $1,3OO. OO
<br />
<br /> On recommendation of the Manager and on motion of Councilman Jerome, seconded by Markel
<br /> and carried, the bid of Ro J. Noble Company in the sum of $11,023.25, was accepted and
<br /> the other bidsrejected and bonds ordered returned.
<br />
<br />Communication was read from the Planning Commission recommending approval of variance
<br />application of Vahan Apelian for permission to use the property situated on the west side
<br />of Flower Street (1702 South Flower Street) for construction of four single-family resi-
<br />dences, as shown on plot plan, and a protest was read with fifty-eight property owner's
<br />signatures abtached opposing the variance. Messrs. G. P. Anderson, Melvin Rosenbaum and
<br />Paul Banks objected to the construction on the basis that it would adversely effect the
<br />value of adjoining property. Mr. Frezon, Expediter and Mr. W. R. Bro,n, Agent of the
<br />applicant,offered to submit a new plot plan. On motion of Councilman Jerome, seconded by
<br />Heinly and carried, the variance application of Vahan Apelian was referred back to the
<br />Planning Commission to receive the new plot plan.
<br />
<br />Communication was read from the Planning C~mmission reconmending approval of variance
<br />application of C. H. Brockman to permit the use of property situated at 1425 South Bri
<br />Street for erection of a 50-square foot Neon sign above the roof of existing building, to
<br />advertise the present business and on motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by N~rkel and
<br />carried, action on the variance was continued to the meeting to be held December 17, 1956
<br />
<br />and the applicant to be notified to appear.
<br />,,
<br />It was moved by Oounci]mau Jerome and seconded by Heinly, that variance application #841
<br />of Industrial Enterprises, Inc., be approved to permit deletion of rear yard requirements
<br />on property situated on the west side of Oak Street from Dyer Road south to the City
<br />Limits (Lots I to 7 inclusive, Tract 2948), subject to the approval of the Fire
<br />
<br />Motion lost.
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman Heinly, seconded by Jerome and carried, action was continued for
<br />two weeks on the variance application of Industrial Enterprises, Inc.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|