75-057 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

on the north, Fifth on the south, Euclid on the west and Rosita Avenue on the east. 3. The area in southeast Santa Am, east of the Edison School be- tween Madison School on the north and the Warner :City Yard on the south. 4. The twelve-block area west of Main and east of Ross between Bishop Street on the north and Beverly on the south. 5. The general area east of Daisy and west of Bristol between Ninth Street on the north and Fifth Street on the south. 6. The central belt of Santa Ana between Fifth Street and Bishop Street extending from Raitt Street on the west to Ross Street on the east. 7. The area in southwest Santa Aha to the north of Santa Arm Valley High School and the west of Smedley Jtmior High in the vicinity of St. Andrew and Greenville Streets. In comparing those identified areas with the ones designated as Target Areas by this Element, it can be clearly seen that basically the seven pri- ority "one" areas match up with the Target Areas across the board. Devia- tions over the last decade have been caused by an expansion of blight into fringe areas and the re~val of substandard residential structures for such projects as the widening of First Street and the expansion of the Civic Center area with its accompanying recycling of adjacent residential land to associated office-professional uses. The priority "two" areas o£ less con- centrated structural deterioration also match with Target Areas. It includes the neighborhoods con, only known as Santa Anita, Silver Acres and Delhi. Priority "two" areas numbered two and three duplicate a tw~-block portion of the Santa Anita neighborhood. The seven priority "three" areas of spot deterioration whthin sound areas (as of 1964) match in two cases with Target Areas, in three with portions of Target Areas am~ areas identified by this study as Potential Problem Area, and in two cases match only with the category of Potential Problem Area. The Progresso and Logan areas both were in a priority one ranking, as was a portion of the Southwest Area (the bulk of which was a priority three .rating). The fifth area of the priority "three" category was rather expansive in nature and so duplicated a number of the areas enumerated previously. It appears clear that the basic location of substandard housing condi- tions has not extensively changed since 196S. It has, in fact, been primarily 00002