Laserfiche WebLink
CUP 76-6 Santa Fe Land Improvement Company <br /> <br />D. Comparable Applications or Circumstances: <br /> <br />Conditional use permit 75-2, llO S. Harbor Boulevard, to permit the <br />establishment of an off-premise advertising sign in the C 2 District <br />was denied by the Planning Commission on 4/15/75 and by the City <br />Council on 5/12/75. <br /> <br />E. Surrounding Zoning: See attached SDM. <br /> <br />F. Present Use: vacant pPoperty <br /> <br />3. General Plan Compatibility: <br /> <br />The General Plan indicates industrial at this location. <br /> <br />4. Staff Evaluation: <br /> <br />In evaluating the proposal under consideration, staff took into consid- <br />eration the following: (1) the City of Santa Ana's General Plan, in- <br />cluding the newly adopted Scenic Corridors Element; (2) the designation <br />of Grand Avenue as an arterial street providing two entrance points into <br />the City; (3) the recently adopted ordinance amendment NS-1301 pertaining <br />to yard, landscaping and offstreet parking requirements in the industrial <br />use districts; (4) Section 41-638 of the Santa Ana Zoning Ordinance <br />setting "Standards for granting applications for minor exceptions, vari- <br />ances and conditional use permits and appeals." <br /> <br />There are approximately seven off-premise advertising signs along Grand <br />Avenue between Fairhaven Avenue and Dyer Road at present. The total length <br />of Grand Avenue between Fairhaven Avenue and Dyer Road is approximately <br />4.5 miles. Therefore, at present, there are approximately 1.5 off-premise <br />advertising signs per mile along Grand Avenue, which would appear to be <br />more than adequate to serve the advertising needs of the area. <br /> <br />The Scenic Corridors Element Df the City's General Plan identifies Grand <br />Avenue as an arterial providing two entrance points into the City. In <br />discussi.ng the entrance point concept, the Scenic Corridors Plan states <br />that, "An.entrance point or entryway into the City may constitute a con- <br />tinuous treatment along the street or entry point, not merely a single sign." <br />To begin to clutter an arterial street designated as an entryway'into the <br />City with numerous off-premise advertising signs would be a detriment to <br />the City's image. <br /> <br />The recently adopted ordinance amendment NS-1301 provided for additional <br />landscaping requirements and for compact parking stalls in the industrial <br />use districts. In discussing the landscape setback requirements, it was <br />stated that: "Landscaped developments are attractive to potential indus- <br />trial occupants and result in increased desirability of the property. <br />This is reflected in higher property values and, hence, revenue to the <br />City. The success, prestige and increased land values of the Irvine <br />Industrial Complex over the past few year~ have been due in no small <br />part to the well landscaped, park-like environment established throughout' <br />the area, an environment created not by one building or one block but <br />by the entire complex." <br /> <br />As the proposed off-premise advertising signs are to be located in the <br />southeast industrial area, which presently contains some of the newer and <br />more attractive industrial and office complexes in the City, and as a <br />large portion of the southeast industrial area is still undeveloped, it <br />is staff's feeling that the proposed off-premis~ ~dYertising signs w~u!d <br />be a detriment to and in conflict with the intended up-grading of the <br />City's industrial areas as reflected in ordinance amendment NS-1301. <br /> <br />CUP 76-6 Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />